Conducive TLE Laboratory Environment and Learning Process Skills of the Students in Cluster 4 Schools in Davao City
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v5i3.825Keywords:
Conducive TLE Laboratory Environment, Home Economics, Learning Process SkillsAbstract
Fundamentally, a conducive TLE laboratory environment was expected to improve the learning process skills of the students. In this study, the researcher selected 200 junior high school students in Cluster 4 Public Secondary Schools in Davao City as the respondents. Stratified random sampling technique was utilized in the selection of the respondents. A non-experimental quantitative research design using a descriptive-correlational method was employed. The data collected were subjected to the following statistical tools: Mean, Pearson Product Moment Correlation, and multiple linear regression analysis. Findings revealed that the conducive TLE laboratory environment and the learning process skills of the students were described as extensive. Further, correlation analysis demonstrated that there was a significant relationship between a conducive TLE laboratory environment and the learning process skills of the students. Evidently, regression analysis proved that a conducive TLE laboratory environment in terms of open-endedness, rule clarity, and material environment were significant predictors of the learning process skills of the students. In other words, a conducive TLE laboratory environment influenced the learning process skills of the students in Cluster 4 Public Secondary Schools in Davao City.
References
Alegre, A., & Cebrian, G. (2019). Impact of the learning environment on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(1), 23-38.
Anders, D., & Evans, M. (2019). The role of observation skills in student learning and development. Journal of Educational Psychology, 111(2), 245-258.
Bernardo, A. B. I., & Garcia, P. R. J. M. (2021). Educational environments and student outcomes: Exploring new paradigms in the Philippine context. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 12(3), 45-59.
Chi, M. T. H., & Wylie, R. (2019). The ICAP framework: Linking cognitive engagement to active learning outcomes. Educational Psychologist, 54(4), 219-243.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Darling-Hammond, L., Burns, D., Campbell, C., Goodwin, A. L., Hammerness, K., Low, E. L., ... & Zeichner, K. (2019). Empowered educators: How high-performing systems shape teaching quality around the world. John Wiley & Sons.
Dorman, J. P., Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2019). Creating a positive learning environment: Classroom management and practice. Routledge
Fisher, K., & Newton, C. (2020). Reshaping learning: A critical analysis of learning environments in schools. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(1), 10-22.
Gislason, N. (2019). The material environment of schools: Design, implementation, and management. Educational Research and Evaluation, 25(1-2), 1-24.
Hämäläinen, R., De Wever, B., Nissinen, K., & Cincinnato, S. (2019). What makes the difference – PIAAC as a resource for understanding the problem-solving skills of Europe’s higher-education adults. Computers & Education, 129, 13-22.
Hopfenbeck, T. N., Stobart, G., & Daly, A. L. (2019). Assessment and learning: Fields apart? Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 26(3), 225-235.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2019). The impact of cooperative learning on student engagement: Results from an intervention. Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 365-373.
Kılıç, D., & Çepni, S. (2020). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students' inference skills in science. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 29(3), 330-342.
Kim, C., & Pekrun, R. (2019). Emotions and motivation in learning and performance. Learning and Instruction, 29(1), 1-2.
Lavy, V., & Naama-Ghanayim, E. (2020). How can active learning enhance student achievement and engagement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(1), 119-136.
McLean, L., Abry, T., Taylor, M., & Jimerson, S. R. (2019). Associations between culturally responsive practices and students’ experiences: School climate as a mediating factor. Psychology in the Schools, 56(9), 1614-1631
Mercer-Mapstone, L., & Matthews, K. E. (2019). Student perceptions of communication skills in undergraduate science. International Journal of Science Education, 41(4), 517-532.
O'Connor, P., & Geiger, M. (2019). Integrating technology and pedagogy: Impacts on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(1), 45-62.
Reyes, M. E., Mendoza, M. R., & Castillo, R. C. (2019). Educational inequities in the Philippines: Insights and challenges. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 51(2), 97-112.
Rimm-Kaufman, S. E., & Sandilos, L. E. (2019). Improving students' relationships with teachers to provide essential supports for learning. American Psychological Association. Retrieved from https://www.apa.org/education/k12/relationships
Sia, L., & Chua, R. (2020). The role of TLE laboratories in promoting practical skills and motivation among students. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 30(2), 67-82.
Siedlecki, S. L. (2020). Understanding descriptive research designs and methods. Clinical Nurse Specialist, 34(1), 8-12. https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000493
Smith, T. W., & Kovacs, J. (2019). Classroom management strategies: The impact of clear rules and expectations on student behavior and learning. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 10(2), 123-136.
Taherdoost, H. (2016). Sampling methods in research methodology; How to choose a sampling technique for research. International Journal of Academic Research in Management (IJARM), 5(2), 18-27. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3205035
Taylor, L., & Parsons, J. (2020). Improving the learning environment through flexible learning spaces. Educational Research and Reviews, 15(5), 285-296.
Zhang, Y., & Hyun, J. H. (2019). The impact of a well-equipped educational environment on student engagement and learning outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 67-77.
Zhao, Y. (2020). An education crisis is a terrible thing to waste: How radical changes can spark student excitement and success. Teachers College Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Social Work and Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.