Reformulating National Defense Policy Through Artificial Intelligence: Enhancing Strategic Decision Making and Ethical Governance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v6i1.1069Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Defense Policy, Explainable AI, National Security, Strategic Decision MakingAbstract
This study examines the role of artificial intelligence (AI) in reformulating national defense policy to enhance strategic decision making. Utilizing a qualitative, descriptive methodology supported by literature reviews and expert interviews, the research analyzes how AI can support data driven policy making, improve risk assessment, and optimize military resources. The research aims to examine how AI can improve operational efficiency, predictive analysis, and response capability against emerging threats. The study applies SWOT and Technology Readiness Level (TRL) frameworks to assess the strategic integration of AI in defense systems. Findings highlight both the opportunities and ethical concerns associated with AI adoption. The findings suggest that AI significantly supports data driven decision-making, enhances risk assessment, and optimizes military resource management. However, ethical and accountability concerns persist, necessitating the inclusion of explainable AI frameworks. The research proposes a structured model for ethical and inclusive AI governance and underscores the need for international cooperation in defense AI development.
References
Adobor, H., & Yawson, R. M. (2022). The Promise of Artificial Intelligence in Combating Public Corruption in the Emerging Economies: A Conceptual Framework. Science and Public Policy, 50(3), 355–370. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac068
Alaja, A., & Sorsa, V. (2020). The Evolution of the National Innovation System as Programmatic Policy Idea in Finland. Science and Public Policy, 47(6), 834–843. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa045
Aleksandrova, A., Ninova, V., & Zhelev, Z. (2023). A Survey on AI Implementation in Finance, (Cyber) Insurance and Financial Controlling. Risks, 11(5), 91. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11050091
Alrabiah, A., & Drew, S. (2020). Proactive Management of Regulatory Policy Ripple Effects via a Computational Hierarchical Change Management Structure. Risks, 8(2), 49. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks8020049
Baum, K., Mantel, S., Schmidt, E., & Speith, T. (2022). From Responsibility to Reason-Giving Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00510-w
Chen, L., Alwi, H., Edwards, C., & Sato, M. (2022). Flight Evaluation of an LPV Sliding Mode Observer for Sensor FTC. Ieee Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 30(3), 1319–1327. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2021.3096946
Dowding, K., & Taylor, B. R. (2024). Algorithmic Decision-Making, Agency Costs, and Institution-Based Trust. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00757-5
Galliott, J., & Wyatt, A. (2021). Considering the Importance of Autonomous Weapon System Design Factors to Future Military Leaders. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 76(2), 219–244. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2021.1940093
Giubilini, A., & Savulescu, J. (2017). The Artificial Moral Advisor. The “Ideal Observer” Meets Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 31(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0285-z
Guardia, F. H. de la, Grant, S., & Miguel, E. (2020). A Framework for Open Policy Analysis. Science and Public Policy, 48(2), 154–163. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa067
Guerra, P., & Castelli, M. (2021). Machine Learning Applied to Banking Supervision a Literature Review. Risks, 9(7), 136. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks9070136
Ho, J., & O’Sullivan, E. (2019). Addressing the Evolving Standardisation Challenges of ‘Smart Systems’ Innovation: Emerging Roles for Government? Science and Public Policy, 46(4), 552–569. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz008
Holmes, M., & Wheeler, N. J. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Nuclear Crisis Decision Making: A Complement, Not a Substitute. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 164–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2333814
Jauernig, J., Uhl, M., & Walkowitz, G. (2022). People Prefer Moral Discretion to Algorithms: Algorithm Aversion Beyond Intransparency. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00495-y
Kalogiannidis, S., Kalfas, D., Papaevangelou, O., Giannarakis, G., & Chatzitheodoridis, F. (2024). The Role of Artificial Intelligence Technology in Predictive Risk Assessment for Business Continuity: A Case Study of Greece. Risks, 12(2). https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12020019
King, T. C., Aggarwal, N., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). Artificial Intelligence Crime: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Foreseeable Threats and Solutions. In Science and Engineering Ethics (Vol. 26, Issue 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-00081-0
Kotaridis, I., & Benekos, G. (2023). Integrating Earth Observation IMINT With OSINT Data to Create Added-Value Multisource Intelligence Information: A Case Study of the Ukraine–Russia War. Security and Defence Quarterly, 43(3), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/170901
Krügel, S., Ostermaier, A., & Uhl, M. (2022). Zombies in the Loop? Humans Trust Untrustworthy AI-Advisors for Ethical Decisions. Philosophy & Technology, 35(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00511-9
Lepri, B., Oliver, N., Letouzé, E., Pentland, A., & Vinck, P. (2017). Fair, Transparent, and Accountable Algorithmic Decision-Making Processes. Philosophy & Technology, 31(4), 611–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-017-0279-x
List, C. (2021). Group Agency and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1213–1242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00454-7
Makridis, C., Borkowski, A., & Alterovitz, G. (2024). Perspectives on Advancing Innovation and Human Flourishing Through a Network of AI Institutes. Science and Public Policy, 51(3), 557–562. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scad088
Mitrović, M. (2021). Assessments and Foreign Policy Implementation of the National Security of Republic of Serbia. Security and Defence Quarterly, 34(2), 7–19. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/135592
Naeem, H., & Hauser, J. (2024). Should We Discourage AI Extension? Epistemic Responsibility and AI. Philosophy & Technology, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00774-4
Nallakaruppan, M. K., Chaturvedi, H., Grover, V., Balusamy, B., Jaraut, P., Bahadur, J., Meena, V. P., & Hameed, I. A. (2024). Credit Risk Assessment and Financial Decision Support Using Explainable Artificial Intelligence. Risks, 12(10), 164. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12100164
O’Shaughnessy, M., Schiff, D., Varshney, L. R., Rozell, C. J., & Davenport, M. A. (2022). What Governs Attitudes Toward Artificial Intelligence Adoption and Governance? Science and Public Policy, 50(2), 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scac056
Owens, E., Sheehan, B., Mullins, M., Cunneen, M., Ressel, J., & Castignani, G. (2022). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) in Insurance. Risks, 10(12), 230. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks10120230
Paglieri, F. (2024). Expropriated Minds: On Some Practical Problems of Generative AI, Beyond Our Cognitive Illusions. Philosophy & Technology, 37(2). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00743-x
Radičić, D., & Pugh, G. (2016). R&D Programmes, Policy Mix, and the ‘European Paradox’: Evidence From European SMEs. Science and Public Policy, scw077. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scw077
Rahman, M. M., Pokharel, B. P., Sayeed, S. A., Bhowmik, S., Kshetri, N., & Eashrak, N. (2024). riskAIchain: AI-Driven IT Infrastructure—Blockchain-Backed Approach for Enhanced Risk Management. Risks, 12(12), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12120206
Ruiter, A. de. (2021). The Distinct Wrong of Deepfakes. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1311–1332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00459-2
Shkalenko, A. V, & Nazarenko, A. (2024). Integration of AI and IoT Into Corporate Social Responsibility Strategies for Financial Risk Management and Sustainable Development. Risks, 12(6), 87. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks12060087
Sio, F. S. d., & Mecacci, G. (2021). Four Responsibility Gaps With Artificial Intelligence: Why They Matter and How to Address Them. Philosophy & Technology, 34(4), 1057–1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00450-x
Taddeo, M., McNeish, D., Blanchard, A., & Edgar, E. (2021). Ethical Principles for Artificial Intelligence in National Defence. Philosophy and Technology, 34(4), 1707–1729. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-021-00482-3
Taylor, I. (2024). Collective Responsibility and Artificial Intelligence. Philosophy & Technology, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00718-y
Vaassen, B. (2022). AI, Opacity, and Personal Autonomy. Philosophy & Technology, 35(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00577-5
Vold, K. (2024). Human-AI cognitive teaming: using AI to support state-level decision making on the resort to force. Australian Journal of International Affairs, 78(2), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10357718.2024.2327383
Wang, S., Xia, M., Shi, X., Hou, B., & Lu, S. (2024). China’s Distinctive Civil–military Integration Policy and Firm Innovation. Science and Public Policy, 51(5), 761–779. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scae013
Weissmann, M. (2025). Future Threat Landscapes: The Impact on Intelligence and Security Services. Security and Defence Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.35467/sdq/197248
Whetsell, T. A., Leiblein, M. J., & Wagner, C. S. (2019). Between Promise and Performance: Science and Technology Policy Implementation Through Network Governance. Science and Public Policy, 47(1), 78–91. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz048
Xu, Z., Chu, B., Geng, H., Nian, X., & Zhang, C. (2024). Model-Guided Learning for Wind Farm Power Optimization. Ieee Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 32(2), 428–439. https://doi.org/10.1109/tcst.2023.3315547
Zobi, M. K. A., & Jarah, B. A. F. (2023). The Role of Internal Auditing in Improving the Accounting Information System in Jordanian Banks by Using Organizational Commitment as a Mediator. Risks, 11(9), 153. https://doi.org/10.3390/risks11090153
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Syarif Hidayatullah, Asep Adang Supriyadi, Ignatius Eko Djoko Purwanto, Guntur Eko Saputro
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
