Learning Interest and Gender Differences in Indonesian High Schools: Their Influence on Understanding the Concepts of Work and Energy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v6i2.1182Keywords:
Gender Differences, Learning Interest, Work and EnergyAbstract
This study examines the influence of gender and learning interest (cognitive [CI] and emotional [EI]) on high school students' conceptual understanding of Work and Energy in physics. A quantitative correlation design was employed with 64 students. A 21-item conceptual test and a 16-item Likert-scale interest questionnaire (7 CI, 9 EI) were administered. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U test (gender), and Spearman correlation (interest). Only 28% of students fully understood the concepts, while 42% did not. No gender differences were found, but interest significantly correlated with conceptual understanding (*r* = 0.36, *p* < 0.05). Conclusion: Interest, not gender, predicts conceptual understanding in physics. The study uniquely integrates cognitive and emotional interest dimensions while assessing gender effects. Physics instruction should enhance interest through real-life contexts to improve engagement and learning. Provides empirical evidence that fostering student interest is crucial for conceptual mastery in physics.
References
Aswegen, E. C. van, & Pendergast, D. (2023). The Impact of Interest: An Emergent Model of Interest Development in The Early Years. Early Child Development and Care, 193(13–14), 1335–1349. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2023.2245575
Aviani, I., Erceg, N., & Mešić, V. (2015). Drawing and Using Free Body Diagrams: Why It May Be Better Not to Decompose Forces. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 11(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.11.020137
Bao, L., & Fritchman, J. C. (2021). Development of a Conceptual Framework for Knowledge Integration in Learning Newton’s Third Law. Physics Education, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.05944
DeDecker, S., Chouvalova, A., Gordon, K., Clemmer, R., & Vale, J. (2022). Memorization: Friend or Foe when Solving Problems in STEM Undergraduate Courses. Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.24908/pceea.vi.15945
Dew, M., Perry, J., Ford, L., Bassichis, W., & Erukhimova, T. (2021). Gendered Performance Differences in Introductory Physics: A Study From A Large Land-Grant University. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 17(1), 10106. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.17.010106
Distrik, I. W., Supardi, Z. A. I., Jatmiko, B., & Yuberti. (2021). The Effects Of Multiple Representations-Based Learning In Improving Concept Understanding And Problem-Solving Ability. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 1796. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012044
Docktor, J. L., & Mestre, J. P. (2014). Synthesis of Discipline-Based Education Research In Physics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research, 10(2), 1–58. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.10.020119
Espinosa, T., Miller, K., Araujo, I., & Mazur, E. (2019). Reducing the Gender Gap in Students’ Physics Self-Efficacy in a Team- and Project-Based Introductory Physics Class. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 10132. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.010132
Fisher, O. J., Fearnshaw, D., Watson, N. J., Green, P., Charnley, F., McFarlane, D., & Sharples, S. (2024). Promoting Equality, Diversity and Inclusion in Research and Funding: Reflections from a Digital Manufacturing Research Network. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 9(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-024-00144-w
Fitriani, R., Maison, Asrial, Purwaningsih, S., & Asma, R. (2023). Diagnosing Students’ Conception of Wave Propagation Using the Five-Tier Isomorphic Instrument. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9461–9473. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5413
Ganesan, U., & Morales, A. R. (2024). A Science Teacher’s Experiences when Fostering Intercultural Competence Among Students in Multilingual Classrooms: a Narrative Study. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 19(1), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-023-10206-y
Hammer, D. (1996). More Than Misconceptions: Multiple Perspectives On Student Knowledge And Reasoning, And An Appropriate Role For Education Research. American Journal of Physics, 64(10), 1316–1325. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18376
Harackiewicz, J. M., Smith, J. L., & Priniski, S. J. (2016). Interest Matters: The Importance of Promoting Interest in Education. Policy Insights Behav Brain Sci, 3(2), 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022146515594631.Marriage
Hauspie, C., Schelfhout, S., Dirix, N., Fonteyne, L., Szmalec, A., & Duyck, W. (2023). Interactions Of Gender With Predictors Of Academic Achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 74(May), 102186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102186
Kahu, E., Nelson, K., & Picton, C. (2017). Student interest as a key driver of engagement for first year students. Student Success, 8(2), 55–66. https://doi.org/10.5204/ssj.v8i2.379
Kalender, Z. Y., Marshman, E., Schunn, C. D., Nokes-Malach, T. J., & Singh, C. (2019). Gendered patterns in the construction of physics identity from motivational factors. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 20119. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020119
Kellberg, S., Keller, M., Nordine, J., Moser, S., & Lewalter, D. (2024). Energy Literacy for All? Exploring Whether Prior Interest and Energy Knowledge Mediate Energy Literacy Development in a Modern Socio-scientific Museum Exhibition. International Journal of Science Education, Part B: Communication and Public Engagement, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548455.2024.2344129
Kijima, R., Yang-Yoshihara, M., & Maekawa, M. S. (2021). Using Design Thinking to Cultivate the Next Generation of Female STEAM Thinkers. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-021-00271-6
Kökver, Y., Pektaş, H. M., & Çelik, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence applications in education: Natural language processing in detecting misconceptions. In Education and Information Technologies (Vol. 30, Issue 3). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12919-1
Kubsch, M. (2024). What Affects the Continued Learning about Energy? Evidence from a 4-year Longitudinal Study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 61(5), 975–997. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21931
Kusairi, S. (2020). A web-based formative feedback system development by utilizing isomorphic multiple choice items to support physics teaching and learning. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3926/jotse.781
Kusairi, S., Sutopo, & Suryadi, A. (2022). Utilizing Isomorphic Multiple-Choice Items to Diagnose Students’ Misconceptions in Force and Motion. New Physics: Sae Mulli, 72(4), 311–318. https://doi.org/10.3938/NPSM.72.311
Kusumaningsih, W., Saputra, H. A., & Aini, A. N. (2019). Cognitive Style and Gender differences in a conceptual understanding of mathematics students. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1280(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1280/4/042017
Liu, G., & Fang, N. (2017). Student Misconceptions of Work and Energy in Engineering Dynamics. Proceedings of the 2017 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Section Annual Conference, March 2017.
Maison, Hidayati, Kurniawan, D. A., & Fitriani, R. (2023). Using an Isomorphic Instrument: What Do Physics Education Students Think About Buoyance? Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(11), 9937–9944. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.5341
Mazer, J. P. (2012). Development and Validation of the Student Interest and Engagement Scales. Communication Methods and Measures, 6(2), 99–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/19312458.2012.679244
Mcdermott, L. C. (1997). Curriculum Development And The Assessment of Student Learning: An Example From The Work-Energy And Impulse- Momentum Theorems. Investigações Em Ensino de Ciências, 2(1), 27–42.
Moraga-pumarino, A., Salvo-garrido, S., & Ortiz-Cea, V. (2025). Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance : Evidence in Business Education Program. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050563
Munfaridah, N., Avraamidou, L., & Goedhart, M. (2021). The Use of Multiple Representations in Undergraduate Physics Education: What Do we Know and Where Do we Go from Here? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/9577
Mustofa, Z., Sutopo, Mufti, N., & Asmichatin, A. (2019). The Impact of Modeling Instruction Based on System Toward Work-Energy Concept Understanding. Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 5(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.21009/1.05209
Neve, D. De, Bronstein, M. V., Leroy, A., Truyts, A., & Everaert, J. (2023). Emotion Regulation in the Classroom: A Network Approach to Model Relations among Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Engagement to Learn, and Relationships with Peers and Teachers. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 52(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-022-01678-2
Nieminen, P., Savinainen, A., & Viiri, J. (2013). Gender Differences in Learning of the Concept of Force, Representational Consistency, and Scientific Reasoning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(5), 1137–1156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9363-y
Oh-Young, C., Gordon, H. R. D., Xing, X., & Filler, J. (2018). Meta-Analytic Procedures for Career and Technical Education Post-secondary Researchers and Practitioners. Journal of Research in Technical Careers, 2(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.9741/2578-2118.1010
Park, M., & Liu, X. (2021). An Investigation of Item Difficulties in Energy Aspects Across Biology, Chemistry, Environmental Science, and Physics. Research in Science Education, 51, 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9819-y
Ramadhany, T., Arafat, Y., & Putra, M. J. (2024). The Effect of Teacher’s Competence, Student’s Interests, and Student’s Motivation on Student’s Learning Outcomes. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 5(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v5i1.700
Shrestha, P. S., Perlman, T. T., & Shaver, S. R. (2023). Addressing Learning Difficulties in Junior High School Physics Education: Insights for Curriculum Development and Teaching Strategies. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dan Humaniora, 12(2), 108–120. https://doi.org/10.35335/jiph.v12i2.35
Singh, C., & Rosengrant, D. (2003). Multiple-choice test of energy and momentum concepts. American Journal of Physics, 71(6), 607–617. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1571832
Singh, C., & Rosengrant, D. (2011). Students’ Conceptual Knowledge of Energy and Momentum. Proceedings of the Physics Education Research Conference. https://doi.org/10.1119/perc.2001.pr.018
Tang, A. L. L., Tung, V., & Cheng, T. (2022). Motivating university management students on studying research methods: influence of career applicability, and emotional and cognitive interests. Education and Training, 64(6), 774–787. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-12-2021-0466
Tong, D., Liu, J., Sun, Y., Liu, Q., Zhang, X., Pan, S., & Bao, L. (2023). Assessment of Student Knowledge Integration in Learning Work and Mechanical Energy. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 19(1), 10127. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.19.010127
Triani, E., Maison, & Nazarudin. (2025). Diagnosing Students’ Misconceptions of Direct Current Electrical Circuits Using a Five-Tier Isomorphic Instrument. Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi, 9(1), 71–86. https://doi.org/10.22437/jiituj.v9i1.40469
Wickham, M. I., van Nunspeet, F., & Ellemers, N. (2023). Gender Identification Beyond the Binary and Its Consequences for Social Well-Being. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 52(3), 1073–1093. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-022-02453-x
Wijekumar, K. (Kay), Zhang, S., & McKeown, D. (2024). Introduction to the Special Issue: Misalignment, Misinterpretation, and Misappropriation of Literacy Research to Practice and Policy. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 29, 1157–1167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-023-09725-y
Yadak, P. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of Gender Gap on the FCI in High School and College Introductory Physics Courses in the US and International Countries. In Doctoral Dissertations. https://repository.usfca.edu/diss/552
Yamtinah, S., Masykuri, M., Ashadi, & Shidiq, A. S. (2017). Gender differences in students’ attitudes toward science: An analysis of students’ science process skill using testlet instrument. AIP Conference Proceedings, 1868. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4995102
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Yustina Safitri, Sentot Kusairi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
