A SIMA-Based Curriculum Data and Administration Management Model to Improve the Effectiveness of Teacher Performance in Public Senior High Schools in North Musi Rawas Regency
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i2.1395Keywords:
Administrative Management, Curriculum Management, Senior High School, SIMA Based System, Teacher PerformanceAbstract
Effective management of curriculum data and school administration is essential for improving teacher performance in public senior high schools. However, many schools still face challenges related to fragmented data systems, high administrative workloads, and limited integration between management information systems and teacher performance indicators. This study aims to develop and evaluate a SIMA-based curriculum data and administration management model to improve teacher performance effectiveness in public senior high schools in North Musi Rawas Regency. This research employed a research and development (R&D) approach, involving needs analysis, model design, development, implementation, and evaluation. Data were collected through questionnaires, observations, and documentation involving teachers and school administrators. Teacher performance effectiveness was measured before and after the implementation of the SIMA-based management model. Data analysis was conducted using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques to examine changes in teacher performance effectiveness. The results indicate that the developed SIMA-based curriculum data and administration management model is valid, practical, and effective. The implementation of the model significantly improved teacher performance effectiveness, particularly in administrative efficiency, time management, accuracy of academic data, and focus on instructional tasks. These findings suggest that integrating curriculum and administrative management through a SIMA-based system can reduce teachers’ administrative burden and enhance their professional performance. This study contributes theoretically to educational management research and practically provides a reference model for schools and policymakers seeking to improve teacher performance through integrated management information systems.
References
Alam, S. S., & Noor, M. K. M. (2020). ICT adoption in educational institutions. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 281–298. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09976-2
Bingimlas, K. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5(3), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75275
Borg, W. R., & Gall, M. D. (2003). Educational research: An introduction (7, Ed.). Allyn & Bacon.
Chukwuemeka, E. J., & Samuel, N. N. (2021). Information systems and teachers’ job performance in secondary schools. International Journal of Educational Management, 35(2), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-03-2020-0115
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5, Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008
Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T. (2010). Teacher technology change: How knowledge, confidence, beliefs, and culture intersect. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 42(3), 255–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2010.10782551
Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., & Duckworth, D. (2020). Preparing for life in a digital world. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38781-5
Ghavifekr, S., & Rosdy, W. A. W. (2015). Teaching and learning with technology: Effectiveness of ICT integration in schools. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.21890/ijres.23596
Ifinedo, P., Rikala, J., & Hämäläinen, T. (2020). Factors affecting teachers’ use of ICT in education. Education and Information Technologies, 25(1), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-09958-4
Isjoni. (2018). Educational leadership management. Alfabeta.
Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2016). Teacher design in ICT integration (Vol. 32, Issue 3).
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3, Ed.). SAGE Publications.
Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. (2020). Regulation No. 15 of 2020 on the fulfillment of teachers’, principals’, and supervisors’ workload.
Mulyasa, E. (2017). Become a professional principal. Remaja Rosdakarya.
Rivai, V., & Sagala, E. J. (2019). Human resource management for companies. Rajawali Pers.
Sagala, S. (2017). Strategic management in improving the quality of education. Alfabeta.
Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., & Tondeur, J. (2019). The technology acceptance model in education. Computers & Education, 128, 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.09.009
Selwyn, N. (2016). Education and technology: Key issues and debates. Bloomsbury.
Sugiyono. (2020). Metode penelitian pendidikan: Pendekatan kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.
Teo, T., Milutinović, V., & Zhou, M. (2019). Modelling ICT integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(3), 687–708. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9629-8
Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2017). Understanding ICT integration. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-016-9488-7
Uno, H. B., & Lamatenggo, N. (2016). Teachers' duties in learning. Bumi Aksara.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Meri Silvia, Nurul Astuty Yensy, Sudarwan Danim
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
