Ex Officio Judicial Authority And Women’s Post-Divorce Rights: A Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah Analysis of Indonesia’s Religious Courts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1697Keywords:
Judicial Ex Officio Authority, Maqāṣid Al-Sharīʿah, Religious Courts, Wives’ Post-Divorce RightsAbstract
The ex officio authority of judges in Indonesian Religious Courts is intended to safeguard wives’ post-divorce rights, yet its implementation remains inconsistent, creating legal uncertainty and undermining substantive justice. This study examines the legal construction and effectiveness of ex officio authority in determining wives’ post-divorce rights in the Religious Courts of Jambi Province through the framework of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah. Employing a normative-empirical legal research design with a qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews with judges, court clerks, legal scholars, and litigants; analysis of court decisions; and field observations across Religious Courts in Jambi Province. The findings reveal three key gaps. First, although ex officio authority possesses strong juridical, philosophical, and sociological foundations, its application varies significantly across judicial panels due to divergent interpretations of judicial passivity versus substantive protection. Second, while the principles of Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah particularly ḥifẓ al-nafs (protection of life), ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of property), and ḥifẓ al-nasl (protection of lineage) provide normative legitimacy for ex officio action, their translation into consistent judicial practice remains limited. Third, institutional weaknesses in enforcement mechanisms and low compliance by former husbands undermine the effectiveness of rights determination even when judges exercise ex officio authority. This study offers a novel conceptual framework integrating positive law, theories of justice, and Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah to reconstruct ex officio authority as a mechanism for achieving substantive gender justice. The proposed framework provides judges with operational guidelines that balance procedural requirements with the protection of vulnerable parties. These findings have implications for judicial training, policy reform, and the strengthening of women’s legal protection in Islamic family law systems across Southeast Asia.
References
Al-Turabi, U. M., & Auda, J. (2025). Toward a Maqāṣid-Based Legal Reform: Systemic Thinking for Social Transformation in the Modern Muslim World. Indonesian Journal of Islamic Law, 8(2), 209–228. https://doi.org/10.35719/fhw10v84
Anam, K., & Susantin, J. (2026). Ex Officio Authority of Judges in Divorce Suit Decisions: An Analysis of Article 41 of Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage in the Pamekasan Religious Court. Hakam: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.33650/jhi.v10i1.14592
Anisa, L. N. (2025). The role of maqashid syariah interpretation in addressing the limitations of traditional Islamic family law for achieving gender-responsive and child-protective legal reforms. Al-Mabsut: Jurnal Studi Islam Dan Sosial, 19(2), 227–240. https://doi.org/10.56997/almabsut.v19i2.2365
Arrasyid, H. F., & Pradikta, H. Y. (2025). Marriage Dispensation and Gender Justice from a Mubādalah Perspective: A Critical Analysis of Tanjungkarang Religious Court Decision No. 131/Pdt. P/2024/PA. Tnk. Journal of Islamic Mubadalah, 194–213. https://doi.org/10.70992/8m1a5j14
Awawda, O. (2024). Assessment of De Jure Judicial Independence of Constitutional Court according to International Guidelines. Const. Rev., 10, 202. https://doi.org/10.31078/consrev1017
Aziz, A., & Abadi, K. (2025). Gender Bias in the Adjudication of Spousal Support in Wife-Initiated Divorce Cases at The Religious Court of Kajen Pekalongan. International Journal of Social Science and Religion (IJSSR), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.53639/ijssr.v6i3.374
Badilag, D. (2023). Annual Report of the Directorate General of Religious Courts 2023.
BPS. (2023). Indonesian Statistics.
Bukido, R., & Aminah, S. (2024). Is Islamic Family Law Fair for Women Not Working After Divorce? Antmind Review: Journal of Sharia and Legal Ethics, 1(2), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.63077/9ngvb155
Damayanti, A. (2024). Legal Certainty of Marriage Agreements Made Before Marriage and Their Implications After Divorce. Sociological Jurisprudence Journal, 7(1), 15–22. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.7.1.2024.15-22
Fachrunisa, S., Qamaria, R. S., & Hanani, N. (2023). Judges’ Perspectives on the Determination of the Amount of Mut’ah, Childbirth Costs, and Child Sustenance in Divorce Cases (The study on the Court’s Decision Number 808/Pdt. G/2021/Pa. Kab. Kdr). El-Usrah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga, 6(1), 54–70. https://doi.org/10.22373/ujhk.v6i1.15537
Fadhilah, N., Musonnif, A., & Hadisiswati, I. (2025). Regulating Arbitrary Divorce in Islamic Family Law: A Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah–Based Comparative Analysis of Muslim-Majority Legal Systems. Al-Hukama’: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 15(2), 149–175. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2025.15.2.149-175
Fahmi, A., Nasir, M., Anshari, N., Aminah, A., & Nurunnabi, M. (2025). Judicial Practices in Enforcing Post-Divorce Maintenance Rights for Women and Children in Indonesia. Indonesia Private Law Review, 6(2), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.25041/iplr.v6i2.4608
Fajriyati, S. N., & Ilyas, M. (2026). Maslahah-Based Judicial Reasoning in Isbat Nikah Cases: Reconciling Legal Certainty and Substantive Justice in the Makassar Religious Court. Al-Adalah: Jurnal Hukum Dan Politik Islam, 11(2), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.30863/ajmpi.v11i2.11401
Fitriyati, Y., Ibrahim, D., Muntaqo, F., & Hasan, K. N. S. (2025). Reconsidering Inheritance Equality: Gender Justice in Religious Court Decisions through the Lens of Maqashid Al-Shariah. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 25(1), 122–140. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v25i1.27133
Harun, N., Yusuf, N., Jumanah, J., Dewi, S. F., Hanim, M. A. F., & Magribi, M. I. (2026). Revisiting Nafaqah Iddah for Women in Court Decisions: Evidence from Muslim-Majority Legal Systems. Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat, 26(1), 111–131. https://doi.org/10.19109/nurani.v26i1.33600
Huchhanavar, S. S. (2023). Conceptualising judicial independence and Accountability from a regulatory perspective. Oslo Law Review, 2, 110–148. https://doi.org/10.18261/olr.9.2.3
Hussain, M., & Akhtar, J. (2025). Recent debates on wife’s right to judicial separation: An analysis of the traditional and modern interpretations of Muslim family laws in Pakistan. Contemporary Islam, 19(1), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-024-00568-7
Ikhsan, I., Rahayu, R., & Sularto, R. B. (2025). Bridging Law and Society: Reorienting Sociological Jurisprudence for Progressive Legal Reform in Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum Progresif, 13(2), 313–350. https://doi.org/10.14710/jhp.13.2.313-350
Imron, M. (2018). The Existence of Ex Officio Rights of Judges in the Religious Court System. Syarif Hidayatullah State Islamic University.
Compilation of Islamic Law, (1991).
Kinchin, N. (2024). “Voiceless”: the procedural gap in algorithmic justice. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, 32, eaae024. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae024
Latassaqia, R., Ma’mun, S., & Umirov, F. (2026). Safeguarding Women’s Rights in Divorce in Absentia: The Role of Ex Officio Judicial Powers in Iddah Maintenance. Al-Syakhsiyyah: Journal of Law and Family Studies, 8(1), 69–94. https://doi.org/10.21154/syakhsiyyah.v8i1.13570
Majid, A. (2025). Islamic Legal Reform Based On Maqāṣid Syarī ‘Ah: A Study Of Al-Ghazālī’s Thoughts And Its Relevance In The Context Of Indonesian Family Law. USRAH: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam, 6(4), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.46773/usrah.v6i4.2195
Molbæk-Steensig, H., & Quemy, A. (2023). Judicial independence and impartiality: Tenure changes at the European Court of Human Rights. European Journal of International Law, 34(3), 581–614. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chad036
Muhammad Syaifuddin, Sri Turatmiyah, dan A. Y. (2013). Divorce Law. Sinar Grafika.
Mustafa, M., Yusoff, R. M., & Wibisana, A. G. (2026). Beyond The Absence of Constitutional Rights: Malaysia’s Multifaceted Framework for Environmental Protection. Malaysian Journal of Syariah and Law, 14(1), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.33102/mjsl.vol14no1.1736
Nastangin, N., & Huda, M. C. (2019). The Urgency of Sighat Taklik Talak in Marriage as a Legal Protection Effort for Women from Maqasid Syari’ah Perspective. Jurnal Mahkamah: Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Hukum Islam, 163–178. https://doi.org/10.25217/jm.v4i2.634
Nawawi, M., Ansari, A., & Harahap, A. M. (2025). Towards Substantive Justice: Reforming Islamic Family Law Regarding the Division of Marital Property in Indonesia. Al-Qadha: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan, 12(2), 356–373. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v12i2.10905
Öztürk, A. (2024). Problems with the Right to Legitimacy. Acta Globalis Humanitatis et Linguarum, 1(1), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.69760/aghel.010240767
Law Number 1 of 1974 on Marriage, as amended by Law Number 16 of 2019, (1974).
Law Number 7 of 1989 on the Religious Courts, as amended by Law Number 3 of 2006, (1989).
Law Number 3 of 2006 concerning the Amendment to Law Number 7 of 1989 on the Religious Courts, (2006).
Popa Tache, C. E., Săraru, C.-S., Pasquier, F., Tarmure-Vădean, M., & de Souza Salles, S. (2025). Applied Methodologies—Integrating Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in Legal Research. In A Transdisciplinary Legal Methodology Guide and Lexicon for Crisis Response (pp. 43–58). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-032-04653-6_3
Quraishi, A. (2001). Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. By Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Cambridge: Cambridge Islamic Texts Society1991. Pp. xxi, 417. Price not available. ISBN: 0-946-62123-3. Paper. ISBN: 0-946-62124-1. Journal of Law and Religion, 15, 385–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1051529
Researcher. (2024). Observation at the Religious Court of Jambi Province.
Supreme Court Decision No. 137 K/AG/2007, (2007).
RI, Mahkamah Agung. (2023). Annual Report of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia.
Ricker, C. L., Earn, S., Das, M., & Greene, M. E. (2023). The right to leave: Dissolution of child, early, and forced marriages and unions. Adolescents, 3(3), 490–507. https://doi.org/10.3390/adolescents3030035
Rofiq, A. (2015). Islamic Civil Law in Indonesia. RajaGrafindo Persada.
Salma, S., Subeitan, S. M., Bilalu, N., Zakariah, A. A., & Muhammad, A. A. (2025). The Authority of Ex Officio Judges in Protecting Women’s and Children’s Rights Post-Divorce at the Manado Religious Court. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 23(1), 102–116. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i1.3318
Saputra, W., Murtadlo, M. A., & Haider, A. (2024). Challenges in Upholding Women’s Post-Divorce Rights: Experiences From Legal Practitioners in the Mataraman Region, East Java. Al-Hukama’: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law, 14(1), 46–73. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2024.14.1.46-73
Sarmadi, A. S., Hafidzi, A., Mohlis, M., Yunin, O., & Korniienko, M. (2025). Negotiating Islamic Law and Customary Practice: Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat and Restorative Justice in Banjar Inheritance Disputes. Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Syir’ah, 23(2), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.30984/jis.v23i2.3673
Solikin, N., & Wasik, M. (2023). The Construction of Family Law in the Compilation of Islamic Law in Indonesia: A Review of John Rawls’s Concept of Justice and Jasser Auda’s Maqashid al-Shari’a. Ulumuna, 27(1), 315–340. https://doi.org/10.20414/ujis.v27i1.708
Sukirman, A., Mukhlas, O. S., & Rosadi, A. (2025). Islamic Judicial Activism in Determining Child Maintenance: Ex Officio Authority and Peaceful Settlement in Indonesian Religious Courts. Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam, 10(2), 671–699. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v10i2.12755
Syam, S. A., Syahnan, M., & Lubis, F. (2025). Judicial Contra Legem Reasoning in the Division of Marital Joint Property: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī ‘ah and Distributive Justice Perspective. Jurnal Ilmiah Gema Perencana, 4(2), 1895–1914. https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.333
Syandika, M. A., Harahap, I. A., Suhardiman, T. A., & Purba, J. (2025). The Protection of Children and Women from the Perspectives of Islamic Law and Indonesian Positive Law. Istidal: Jurnal Studi Hukum Islam, 12(1), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.34001/ijshi.v12i1.8116
Tarigan, A. N. dan A. A. (2016). Islamic Civil Law in Indonesia: A Critical Study of the Development of Islamic Law from Fiqh, Law Number 1 of 1974, to the Compilation of Islamic Law. Kencana.
Timothy, A. (2026). Witness Interference and Constitutional Adjudication in Uganda: A Comparative Analysis with Islamic Legal Ethics and Fair Trial Guarantees. Al-Amīr Research Journal for Islamic Studies, 7(02), 44–77. https://doi.org/10.67101/alamir.v7i02.343
Wahda, N. A., Sabir, M., & Anas, M. F. (2025). The Fulfillment of Post-Divorce Rights for Former Wives and Children in Bantaeng Regency: A Maqāṣid al-Sharī ‘ah Analysis. Parewa Saraq: Journal of Islamic Law and Fatwa Review, 4(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.64016/parewasaraq.v4i1.25
Wahidullah, W., & Wahid, R. K. M. (2026). Philosophical Perspectives on Divorce Litigation and Women’s Rights in Islamic Family Law: A Study of Indonesian Context. Al Qodiri: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial Dan Keagamaan, 24(2), 315–329. https://doi.org/10.53515/alqodiri.v24i2.107
Wibisono, Y., & Roeslan, F. (2025). The Concept of Maqāṣid al-Sharī ‘ah and Maṣlaḥah in the Classical and Contemporary TafsÎr. International Journal of Islamic Economics and Business Sustainability (IJIEBS), 1(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.7454/ijiebs.v1i2.1021
Widiartana, G., & Hussain, S. (2025). Judicial Pardon in Contemporary Criminal Verdicts: Balancing Justice, Legal Certainty, and the Utility of Law. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies, 4(01), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17346796
Yanti, N., Candra, E., Hafiz, M., Siregar, I. P., & Anggriani, I. V. (2026). Patterns and Determinants of Judicial Reasoning in Deciding Women Economic Rights in Religious Courts. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2026.20.2.212-242
Yong, G. (2024). A Comparative Study on Procedural Adjudication. In Criminal Procedural Trial in China: Procedure of Excluding Illegal Evidence as an Example (pp. 63–123). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-97-4935-5_3
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ainul Mardhiah, Ahmad Syukri Saleh, Fauzi Muhammad
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
