Implementation of the Mobile School Program in Increasing the Quality of Education
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v4i3.490Keywords:
Mobile School Program, Education, QualityAbstract
This study aims to describe how the implementation of the driving school program in improving the quality of education at SMAN South Sumatra. This research was conducted at the South Sumatra High School located in Jakabaring, Palembang, South Sumatra. implementation in this research activity, namely for two months from November 10 to December 10, 2022. The research is a type of qualitative research with an analytical descriptive flow that has the aim of proving various kinds of norms and theories regarding the quality of education in terms of the Pancasila Strengthening Project Bangunlah jiwa and Body and its application to the object of research. In qualitative research, the information obtained is generally in the form of words, and descriptive, and the majority is not in the form of numbers. Collecting data and information obtained by researchers while in the field by obtaining direct surveys and documentation and research results, almost 90% of students can implement the driving school program to improve education at SMAN South Sumatra from the results of the researcher’s evaluation.
References
Analiya, T. R., & Arifin, R. (2022). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Anak Dalam Kasus Bullying Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 Tentang Perlindungan Anak Di Indonesia [Legal Protection for Children in Bullying Cases According to Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection in Indonesia]. Journal of Gender and Social Inclusion in Muslim Societies, 3(1), 36-54.
Aristovnik, A., Keržič, D., Ravšelj, D., Tomaževič, N., & Umek, L. (2020). Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: A global perspective. Sustainability, 12(20), 8438.
Dron, J. (2018). Smart learning environments, and not so smart learning environments: a systems view. Smart Learning Environments, 5(1), 1-20.
Epstein, J. L. (1995). School/family/community partnerships. Phi delta kappan, 76(9), 701.
Jentoft, N., & Olsen, T. S. (2019). Against the flow in data collection: How data triangulation combined with a ‘slow’interview technique enriches data. Qualitative Social Work, 18(2), 179-193.
Juliansyah, M. (2022). Development of Local Wisdom-Based Modules in Banyuasin Regency for Class IV SD Negeri 14 Muara Terang. Journal of Education and Counseling. Vol 4, No 3. Pgs 2137-2140
Juliansyah M. (2020). The Influence of Audio-Visual Animation Learning Media on Science Learning Outcomes of Grade IV Students at SDN 05 Palembang. Journal of Education and Counseling. Vol 4, No 3. Matter. 1414-1418.
Lucas, C. G., Bridgers, S., Griffiths, T. L., & Gopnik, A. (2014). When children are better (or at least more open-minded) learners than adults: Developmental differences in learning the forms of causal relationships. Cognition, 131(2), 284-299.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1992), Qualitative Data Analysis. Jakarta: UI-Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Qualitative Research Methods. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Moleong, L. J. (1990). Qualitative Research Methodology Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sahlberg, P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of education policy, 22(2), 147-171.
Sen, A. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford Paperbacks.
Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological science in the public interest, 12(1), 3-54.
Sugiyono. (2009). Understanding Qualitative Research. Bandung: Alfabeta
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Social Work and Science Education
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
