Guiding Science and Technology: A Systematic Literature Review on the Role of Philosophy of Science
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1322Keywords:
Directing the Development of Science and Technology, Philosophy of Science, Systematic Literature ReviewAbstract
Philosophy of science has a very essential role in directing the development of science and technology. As a discipline that studies the nature, methods, and limitations of science, philosophy of science helps provide epistemological, ontological, and axiological foundations in the development of various scientific fields. This study aims to examine the role of philosophy of science in shaping scientific paradigms and its impact on the development of science and technology through the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) approach. By analyzing various studies published in the last five years, this study found that philosophy of science not only functions as a conceptual framework for the development of science, but also as an ethical guide in the use of technology. The research findings show that a deep understanding of the philosophy of science can improve the integration between technological innovation and human values, resulting in more responsible and sustainable scientific development. Thus, this study emphasizes the urgency of a philosophical approach in ensuring the direction of the development of science and technology that is in line with the needs of society and the principles of ethics and sustainability.
References
Ahmed, N., & Wahed, M. (2020). The De-democratization of AI: Deep Learning and the Compute Divide in Artificial Intelligence Research. http://arxiv.org/abs/2010.15581
Anand, G., Larson, E. C., & Mahoney, J. T. (2020). Thomas Kuhn on Paradigms. Production and Operations Management, 29(7), 1650–1657. https://doi.org/10.1111/poms.13188
Babushkina, D., & Votsis, A. (2022). Epistemo-ethical constraints on AI-human decision making for diagnostic purposes. Ethics and Information Technology, 24(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-022-09629-y
Balazka, D., & Rodighiero, D. (2020). Big Data and the Little Big Bang: An Epistemological (R)evolution. Frontiers in Big Data, 3(September), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fdata.2020.00031
Bantwal Rao, M. (2022). The Use of Examples in Philosophy of Technology. Foundations of Science, 27(4), 1421–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09819-9
Bate, G. W. (2025). What Can We Learn from the Philosophy of Technology? Research Technology Management, 68(4), 72–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2025.2497931
Bögner, F., & Figà-Talamanca, G. (2025). Developmental Moral Progress in Technology Research: the Case of the Personalized Parkinson’s Project. Philosophy and Technology, 38(3), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00951-z
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2023). Toward good practice in thematic analysis: Avoiding common problems and be(com)ing a knowing researcher. International Journal of Transgender Health, 24(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1080/26895269.2022.2129597
Buben, A. (2025). Digital Replacement of the Dead: A Legitimate Worry? Philosophy & Technology, 38(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00913-5
Carrera-Rivera, A., Ochoa, W., Larrinaga, F., & Lasa, G. (2022). How-to conduct a systematic literature review: A quick guide for computer science research. MethodsX, 9, 101895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2022.101895
Cassinadri, G. (2024). ChatGPT and the Technology-Education Tension: Applying Contextual Virtue Epistemology to a Cognitive Artifact. Philosophy and Technology, 37(1), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00701-7
Cech, F. (2022). Algorithmic Accountability: Transparency, Agency and Literacy in the Age of the Algorithm. https://repositum.tuwien.at/handle/20.500.12708/139974
Culture, A. I., & Humphreys, D. (2025). AI ’ s Epistemic Harm : Reinforcement Learning , Collective. 1–27.
Desai, J., Watson, D., Wang, V., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2022). The epistemological foundations of data science: a critical review. Synthese, 200(6), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03933-2
Emmert-Streib, F. (2021). From the Digital Data Revolution toward a Digital Society: Pervasiveness of Artificial Intelligence. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 3(1), 284–298. https://doi.org/10.3390/make3010014
Floridi, L. (2023). AI as Agency Without Intelligence: on ChatGPT, Large Language Models, and Other Generative Models. Philosophy and Technology, 36(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-023-00621-y
Hambali, A., Herniawati, A., & Hidayat, Y. (2024). Scope of the Philosophy of Science: A Review of Philosophical Education. Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature, 3(3), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.54012/jcell.v3i3.263
Hauswald, R. (2025). Artificial Epistemic Authorities. Social Epistemology, 00(00), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2025.2449602
Heilinger, J. C. (2022). The Ethics of AI Ethics. A Constructive Critique. Philosophy and Technology, 35(3), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-022-00557-9
Kamali, J., Alpat, M. F., & Bozkurt, A. (2024). AI ethics as a complex and multifaceted challenge: decoding educators’ AI ethics alignment through the lens of activity theory. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00496-9
Koskinen, I. (2024). We Have No Satisfactory Social Epistemology of AI-Based Science. Social Epistemology, 38(4), 458–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2286253
Marcos, A. (2021). Philosophy of Science and Philosophy: The Long Flight Home. Axiomathes, 31(6), 695–702. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-021-09574-3
Maslen, C. (2024). Does Philosophy Make Less Progress than Other Academic Fields? Philosophia (United States), 52(4), 1107–1119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-024-00780-y
Morley, J., Floridi, L., Kinsey, L., & Elhalal, A. (2020). From What to How: An Initial Review of Publicly Available AI Ethics Tools, Methods and Research to Translate Principles into Practices. Science and Engineering Ethics, 26(4), 2141–2168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00165-5
Ortmann, J. (2025). Of opaque oracles: epistemic dependence on AI in science poses no novel problems for social epistemology. Synthese, 205(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-025-04930-x
Pezzano, G. (2025). Philosophy & Media : A Conceptual Typology. 1–27.
Pezzano, G., & Pavanini, M. (2025). Understanding Philosophical Media: From Philosophy of Technology to “Technologies of Philosophy.” Philosophy and Technology, 38(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00937-x
Rethlefsen, M. L., & Page, M. J. (2022). PRISMA 2020 and PRISMA-S: common questions on tracking records and the flow diagram. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 110(2), 253–257. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2022.1449
Robertson, I. (2025). AI, Trust and Reliability. Philosophy and Technology, 38(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00924-2
Russo, F., Schliesser, E., & Wagemans, J. (2024). Connecting ethics and epistemology of AI. AI and Society, 39(4), 1585–1603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01617-6
Vandemeulebroucke, T., Pelger, J., & Bolte, L. (2025). Being Blinded by the Concrete – On the Extractivist Blindspot of the Empirical Turn in Philosophy of Technology. Philosophy and Technology, 38(3), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00949-7
Walsh, E. (2025). Idealisation and Scientific Literacy in the Governance of Facial Analysis Technologies: Reply To Gentzel. Philosophy and Technology, 38(3), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-025-00939-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Tanti Permata Sari, Devi Sylvianica, Tri Emelia Rostari, Dian Lestari, Meri Andani
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
