Navigating the Transition: A Qualitative Inquiry into Hybrid Administrative Systems in a Regional Indonesian Junior High School

Authors

  • Sisi Suksesiawati Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Sudarwan Danim Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Asti Putri Kartiwi Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i2.1488

Keywords:

Digital Transformation, Hybrid Administrative Systems, Regional Schools, School Administration, Transitional Challenges

Abstract

While extensive scholarship addresses either fully manual or comprehensively digitalized school administration, transitional phases where both systems coexist remain critically underexplored. This qualitative single-case study examines how State Junior High School 03 of Central Bengkulu navigates digital transformation, revealing operational dynamics, efficiency implications, and strategic challenges inherent in hybrid administrative systems. Through interviews, document analysis, and observation with six administrative personnel, the investigation uncovers that digitalization remains confined to student affairs (Dapodik platform) and financial management (ARKAS system), whereas personnel administration, infrastructure management, and correspondence persist manually. This bifurcation creates duplication of effort, simultaneously enabling regulatory compliance while undermining operational efficiency. Four interconnected barriers emerged: intermittent internet connectivity, heterogeneous digital competencies, constrained budgets, and psychological resistance rooted in competence anxieties. These findings challenge linear stage models of technology adoption by demonstrating that hybrid systems in resource-constrained contexts function as semi-permanent organizational equilibria rather than temporary transitions. Theoretically, the study extends digital transformation scholarship by establishing hybridity as a distinct organizational form warranting its own analytical frameworks, not merely a developmental stage. Practically, findings inform context-sensitive implementation strategies for regional schools, emphasizing sequential roadmaps prioritizing high-impact domains, sustained competency development, and change management acknowledging staff apprehensions. This research contributes a reconceptualization of hybrid administration as potentially enduring rather than transitional, necessitating strategic management beyond linear digitalization assumptions.

References

Ahmed, S., & Hassan, M. (2024). Psychological barriers to educational technology adoption in rural Pakistani schools: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Educational Development, 104, 102943. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2023.102943

Anderson, R. J., Mitchell, S. K., & Thompson, D. L. (2023). Technological fragmentation in school administration: How multiple incompatible systems undermine efficiency. British Educational Research Journal, 49(6), 1284-1303. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3823

Chen, L., & Zhang, W. (2023). Digital transformation of school management in Chinese vocational education: Benefits, challenges, and paradoxes. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 51(4), 892-911. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432221089456

DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147-160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101

García-Morales, V. J., Martín-Rojas, R., & Lardón-López, M. E. (2023). Influence of technological support on organizational agility, exploration, and exploitation in schools: Mediating effects of knowledge management. Technology in Society, 72, 102169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2022.102169

Hartono, H., Suparto, S., & Rafida, T. (2024). Challenges of digital transformation in educational administration: Evidence from Indonesian rural schools. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 56(1), 45-63. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620.2023.2198765

Johnson, M. P., & Williams, K. (2024). Beyond the digital divide: Understanding administrative technology adoption in under-resourced schools. Educational Administration Quarterly, 60(2), 287-315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X23001234

Kotter, J. P. (2012). Leading change. Harvard Business Press. https://doi.org/10.1108/sd.2013.05629ead.012

Kumar, A., & Sharma, R. (2024). Infrastructure constraints and digital education initiatives in rural India: A multi-site case study. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 54(3), 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/03057925.2023.2187654

Lee, J. H., & Kim, S. Y. (2023). Patterns of school management information system adoption in Korean rural schools: A longitudinal study. Asia Pacific Education Review, 24(4), 623-641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-023-09856-3

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8

Martinez, P., & Rodriguez, C. (2024). Persistent hybridity: Why rural schools maintain mixed manual-digital administrative systems. European Journal of Education, 59(1), e12487. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12487

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020901724

Nguyen, T. H., Pham, L., & Tran, V. D. (2023). Generational divides in educational technology adoption: Evidence from Vietnamese secondary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 127, 104089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2023.104089

Oliveira, M., & Ferreira, J. J. (2024). Digital transformation maturity models in educational institutions: A systematic literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 29(3), 3421-3458. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11967-2

Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404-428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600

Park, J., Lee, H., & Kim, D. (2024). When digital mandates meet organizational reality: Implementation challenges in Korean school administration. School Leadership & Management, 44(2), 178-197. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2023.2289765

Pettersson, F., & Olofsson, A. D. (2023). Implementing school digitalization in practice: New insights from school leaders’ agency and leadership. Nordic Journal of Digital Literacy, 18(1), 31-46. https://doi.org/10.18261/njdl.18.1.3

Rahman, M. M., & Karim, A. (2024). Organizational resistance to digital transformation in Bangladeshi educational institutions: A socio-technical perspective. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(2), 445-464. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-08-2023-0389

Silva, A. C., & Costa, E. F. (2024). Learning curves and efficiency transitions during administrative digitalization: Longitudinal evidence from Brazilian municipal schools. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 32(15), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.32.7896

Smith, P. R., & Anderson, K. L. (2023). Strategic planning for school administrative technology: Lessons from successful implementations. Journal of Educational Change, 24(3), 487-512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-023-09467-1

Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., & Siddiq, F. (2024). Teachers’ technology integration practices: A comprehensive review of determinants and implications. Educational Research Review, 41, 100567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2023.100567

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2023). A theoretical extension of technology acceptance models for organizational contexts: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 69(5), 2987-3006. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.4565

Wang, Y., Chen, N. S., & Levy, M. (2024). Digital transformation of educational administration during and after COVID-19: Systematic review and research agenda. Computers & Education, 201, 104836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2023.104836

Williams, J., & Thompson, H. (2023). Measuring administrative efficiency in digitalized schools: Development and validation of a multidimensional instrument. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 35(2), 211-238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-023-09402-7

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.1177/109634809702100108

Zhang, K., & Bonk, C. J. (2024). School administrators’ perspectives on technology integration: A mixed-methods investigation across educational contexts. Computers in Human Behavior, 151, 108029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.108029

Downloads

Published

2026-04-07

How to Cite

Suksesiawati, S., Danim, S., & Kartiwi, A. P. (2026). Navigating the Transition: A Qualitative Inquiry into Hybrid Administrative Systems in a Regional Indonesian Junior High School. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(2), 1530–1546. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i2.1488

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.