Program Effectiveness, Governance, and Household Welfare: A Path Analysis of Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meal Program in East Jakarta

Authors

  • Audrey Belinda Indria Universitas Padjadjaran, West Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i3.1577

Keywords:

Economic Welfare, Free Nutritious Meal Program, Path Analysis, Program Effectiveness, Program Governance

Abstract

This study analyzes the influence of Free Nutritious Meal Program (MBG) effectiveness and program governance on household economic welfare in East Jakarta, Indonesia. Using a quantitative survey design, data were collected from 402 MBG beneficiary households selected through purposive sampling. Path analysis was employed to examine direct and indirect relationships among program governance, program effectiveness, and household economic welfare. Results indicate that program governance has a positive and significant effect on program effectiveness (β = 0.323, p < 0.001), and program effectiveness in turn has a positive and significant effect on household economic welfare (direct effect not fully reported in current manuscript). However, the model explains only 10.5% of the variance in program effectiveness and 6.7% of the variance in household economic welfare, suggesting that unmeasured factors such as household income, employment status, food prices, and social support networks play substantial roles in determining welfare outcomes. These findings confirm that good governance (transparency, accountability, and efficient distribution) enhances program effectiveness, and effective programs contribute to household welfare by reducing food expenditure burdens. The study contributes to the literature on social protection governance by demonstrating that program success depends not only on resource allocation but also on governance quality. Limitations include cross-sectional design (precluding causal inference), low explanatory power, and geographic restriction to East Jakarta. Future research should incorporate additional welfare determinants and employ longitudinal designs.

References

Aiken, E., Bellue, S., Karlan, D., Udry, C., & Blumenstock, J. E. (2022). Machine learning and phone data can improve targeting of humanitarian aid. Nature, 603(7903), 864–870. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04484-9

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Purnamasari, R. (2013). Does elite capture matter? American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.103.3.101

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. (2012). Targeting the poor: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. (2016). Targeting the poor. American Economic Review. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150845

Azisan, A., Tamma, S., & Yunus, A. (2024). Challenges in the implementation of cash social assistance (BST) programs in Indonesia BT - Proceedings of the World Conference on Governance and Social Sciences (WCGSS 2023) (pp. 4–13). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-236-1_2

Banerjee, A., Duflo, E., Goldberg, N., Karlan, D., Osei, R., Pariente, W., & Udry, C. (2015). A multifaceted program causes lasting progress for the very poor. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260799

Bank, W. (2022). Social protection and jobs overview. World Bank.

Bastagli, F., Hagen-Zanker, J., Harman, L., Barca, V., Sturge, G., Schmidt, T., & Pellerano, L. (2019). The impact of cash transfers: A review of evidence. Journal of Development Studies, 55(3), 437–459. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2018.1538383

Black, R. E., & al., et. (2013). Maternal and child undernutrition. The Lancet. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X

Brown, C., Ravallion, M., & van de Walle, D. (2018). A Poor Means Test? Econometric Targeting in Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 134, 109–124. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2018.05.004

Conning, J., & Kevane, M. (2002). Community-based targeting mechanisms for social safety nets. World Development, 30(11), 1877–1896. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-750X(02)00128-9

Davis, B., Handa, S., Hypher, N., Winder Rossi, N., Winters, P., & Yablonski, J. (2016). From evidence to action: The impact of social protection on food security. World Development, 77, 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.08.007

Follett, L., & Henderson, H. (2023). A hybrid approach to targeting social assistance. Journal of Development Economics, 160, 103002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2022.103002

Gasior, K., Jara, H. X., & Makovec, M. (2024). Assessing the effectiveness of social protection measures in mitigating COVID-19-related income shocks in the European Union. Economic Analysis and Policy, 83, 583–605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2024.07.004

Gentilini, U., Almenfi, M., & Dale, P. (2021). Social protection and jobs responses to COVID-19. World Bank.

Hidrobo, M., Hoddinott, J., Peterman, A., Margolies, A., & Moreira, V. (2014). Cash, food, or vouchers? World Development. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2013.10.006

Jara, H. X., Montesdeoca, L., & Tasseva, I. (2022). The Role of Automatic Stabilizers and Emergency Tax-Benefit Policies During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence from Ecuador. The European Journal of Development Research, 34, 2787–2809. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-021-00490-1

Kabeer, N., & Waddington, H. (2015). Economic impacts of social cash transfers in low-income countries. Journal of Development Studies, 51(8), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2015.1018887

Kidd, S., & Wylde, E. (2011). Targeting the poorest: An assessment of social targeting systems. Development Policy Review, 29(5), 599–620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2011.00551.x

Lagarde, M., Haines, A., & Palmer, N. (2007). Conditional cash transfers for improving health interventions. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.39285.300081.94

Light, C., Nwaobia, G. E., & Nwobia, L. I. (2024). Effects of conditional and unconditional cash transfers on poverty reduction, education, and health outcomes in Sub-Saharan Africa—A PRISMA approach. Journal of Poverty. https://doi.org/10.1080/10875549.2024.2426807

Lindert, K., Karippacheril, T. G., Rodriguez Caillava, I., & Nishikawa Chavez, K. (Eds.). (2020). Sourcebook on the Foundations of Social Protection Delivery Systems. World Bank. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/entities/publication/c44dc506-72dd-5428-a088-6fb7aea53095

Paler, L. (2019). Decentralization and service delivery outcomes. Journal of Public Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104072

Pega, F., Pabayo, R., Benny, C., Lee, E.-Y., Lhachimi, S. K., & Liu, S. Y. (2022). Unconditional cash transfers for reducing poverty and vulnerabilities: Effect on use of health services and health outcomes in low- and middle-income countries. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2022(3), CD011135. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD011135.pub3

Ravallion, M. (2009). How relevant is targeting to the success of anti-poverty programs? World Bank Research Observer, 24(2), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.1093/wbro/lkp008

Slater, R., & Farrington, J. (2009). Targeting of social transfers: Options and challenges. Development Policy Review, 27(3), 311–330. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7679.2009.00444.x

Downloads

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

Indria, A. B. (2026). Program Effectiveness, Governance, and Household Welfare: A Path Analysis of Indonesia’s Free Nutritious Meal Program in East Jakarta. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(3), 2211–2228. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i3.1577

Similar Articles

<< < 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.