Inclusive Classroom Management to Accommodate Diverse Student Characteristics and Learning Preferences in Indonesian Primary Education: A Qualitative Case Study
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i3.1587Keywords:
Classroom Management, Differentiated Instruction, Inclusive Education, Learning Preferences, Primary EducationAbstract
This qualitative case study examined inclusive classroom management practices accommodating diverse student characteristics and learning preferences at SD Negeri 6 Muara Rupit, a public elementary school in Indonesia. Participants included two classroom teachers, twenty-eight students, and the school principal, selected purposively. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, non-participant classroom observations, and document analysis (lesson plans and teaching modules). The interactive model of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing guided data analysis. Findings revealed four main themes. First, teachers implemented systematic planning by designing varied instructional activities and flexible seating arrangements before instruction. Second, classroom implementation involved interactive strategies, including group discussions, collaborative learning, questioning sessions, and positive behavior management rather than punitive approaches. Third, classroom organization featured flexible seating rearrangements and heterogeneous grouping to facilitate peer interaction. Fourth, teachers employed adaptive strategies such as simplifying explanations, providing individual guidance, and varying instructional methods to address challenges including student diversity, limited instructional time, and constrained resources. Supporting factors included teacher competence, positive teacher-student relationships, school leadership support, and available facilities. The study concludes that inclusive classroom management extends beyond behavioral control to function as a comprehensive pedagogical framework for creating participatory, student-centered learning environments. Practical implications recommend targeted professional development in differentiated instruction, flexible classroom design, and positive behavior support. Limitations include the single-site focus and a stronger emphasis on teacher perspectives than student voices. Future research should examine inclusive classroom management across diverse school contexts and include student perspectives more extensively.
References
Al Maktoum, S. B., & Al Kaabi, A. M. (2024). Exploring teachers’ experiences within the teacher evaluation process: A qualitative multi-case study. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2287931
Bodfield, K. S., Carey, P., Putwain, D. W., & Rowley, A. (2025). A thematic analysis of self-reported teacher perceptions and management of atypical student behaviours and their relation to the student self-concept. Pastoral Care in Education, 43(2), 262–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643944.2023.2289488
Busetto, L., Wick, W., & Gumbinger, C. (2020). How to use and assess qualitative research methods. Neurological Research and Practice, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42466-020-00059-z
Cevikbas, M., König, J., & Rothland, M. (2024). Empirical research on teacher competence in mathematics lesson planning: recent developments. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 56(1), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01487-2
Coles, E., Anderson, J., Maxwell, M., Harris, F. M., Gray, N. M., Milner, G., & MacGillivray, S. (2020). The influence of contextual factors on healthcare quality improvement initiatives: A realist review. Systematic Reviews, 9(1), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-020-01344-3
Dahlin, E. (2021). Email Interviews: A Guide to Research Design and Implementation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 20, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211025453
Dursun, F., & Aykan, A. (2025). Exploring Teachers’ Narratives: Challenges and Strategies for Enhancing the Teaching Process. SAGE Open, 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440251332557
Fetters, M. D., & Tajima, C. (2022). Joint Displays of Integrated Data Collection in Mixed Methods Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221104564
Gomes, S., Costa, L., Martinho, C., Dias, J., Xexéo, G., & Moura Santos, A. (2023). Modeling students’ behavioral engagement through different in-class behavior styles. International Journal of STEM Education, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00407-w
Gore, J., & Rosser, B. (2022). Beyond content-focused professional development: powerful professional learning through genuine learning communities across grades and subjects. Professional Development in Education, 48(2), 218–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1725904
Gotlieb, R. J. M., Immordino-Yang, M. H., Gonzalez, E., Rhinehart, L., Mahjouri, S., Pueschel, E., & Nadaya, G. (2022). Becoming Literate: Educational Implications of Coordinated Neuropsychological Development of Reading and Social-Emotional Functioning Among Diverse Youth. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 71(1), 80–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/23813377221120107
Gumede, L., & Badriparsad, N. (2022). Online teaching and learning through the students’ eyes – Uncertainty through the COVID-19 lockdown: A qualitative case study in Gauteng province, South Africa. Radiography, 28(1), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2021.10.018
Hagenaars, M., Dizdaric, E., D’hondt, F., & Stevens, P. A. J. (2025). Intercultural actions speak louder than words: How teachers apply culturally relevant practices in ethnic diverse classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 154(January 2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104853
Hattie, J., & O’Leary, T. (2025). Learning Styles, Preferences, or Strategies? An Explanation for the Resurgence of Styles Across Many Meta-analyses. Educational Psychology Review, 37(2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-025-10002-w
Hedegaard-Soerensen, L., & Penthin Grumloese, S. (2020). Student-teacher dialogue for lesson planning: inclusion in the context of national policy and local culture. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 6(1), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/20020317.2020.1747376
Kelly, O., Buckley, K., Lieberman, L. J., & Arndt, K. (2022). Universal Design for Learning - A framework for inclusion in Outdoor Learning. Journal of Outdoor and Environmental Education, 25(1), 75–89. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42322-022-00096-z
Kong, D., & Chen, J. (2022). Diversity and inclusion in global higher education: Lessons from across Asia. In Innovations in Education and Teaching International (Vol. 59, Number 2). https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2022.2041960
Könings, K. D., Mordang, S., Smeenk, F., Stassen, L., & Ramani, S. (2021). Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning: AMEE Guide No. 138. Medical Teacher, 43(8), 924–936. https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1838464
Korpershoek, H., de Boer, H., & Mouw, J. M. (2025). An Update of the Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Classroom Management Interventions on Students’ Academic, Behavioral, Social-Emotional, and Motivational Outcomes. Review of Educational Research, XX(X), 1–41. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543251361903
Lindner, K. T., & Schwab, S. (2025). Differentiation and individualisation in inclusive education: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 29(12), 2199–2219. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603116.2020.1813450
Michelen, M., Phan, M., Zimmer, A., Coury, N., Morey, B., Montiel Hernandez, G., Cantero, P., Zarate, S., Foo, M. A., Tanjasiri, S., Billimek, J., & LeBrón, A. M. W. (2024). Practical Qualitative Data Analysis for Public Health Research: A Guide to a Team-Based Approach With Flexible Coding. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241289279
Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 46(5), 756–778. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1823314
Pantić, N., Galey, S., Florian, L., Joksimović, S., Viry, G., Gašević, D., Knutes Nyqvist, H., & Kyritsi, K. (2022). Making sense of teacher agency for change with social and epistemic network analysis. In Journal of Educational Change (Vol. 23, Number 2). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-021-09413-7
Poort, I., Jansen, E., & Hofman, A. (2022). Does the group matter? Effects of trust, cultural diversity, and group formation on engagement in group work in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development, 41(2), 511–526. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2020.1839024
Sinclair, S., Dhingra, S., Bouchal, S. R., MacInnis, C., Harris, D., Roze des Ordons, A., & Pesut, B. (2024). The initial validation of an Evidence-informed, competency-based, Applied Compassion Training (EnACT) program: a multimethod study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05663-0
Taş, H., & Minaz, M. B. (2024). The Effects of Learning Style-Based Differentiated Instructional Activities on Academic Achievement and Learning Retention in the Social Studies Course. SAGE Open, 14(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241249290
Valtonen, T., Leppänen, U., Hyypiä, M., Sointu, E., Smits, A., & Tondeur, J. (2020). Fresh perspectives on TPACK: pre-service teachers’ own appraisal of their challenging and confident TPACK areas. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 2823–2842. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-019-10092-4
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Khairiyah Khairiyah, Manap Somantri, Muhammad Kristiawan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
