Managing Early Literacy Learning in Grade One Elementary Classrooms

Authors

  • Eka Syafitri Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Dessy Wardiah Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Syaiful Eddy Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1629

Keywords:

Classroom Literacy Environment, Early Literacy Management, Elementary Education, Family Involvement, Merdeka Curriculum

Abstract

Early literacy in the first grade is not only a technical matter of teaching children to identify letters, syllables, and simple words; it is also a managerial issue that requires planning, classroom organization, instructional enactment, assessment, and family-school coordination. This study describes how early literacy learning was managed in a Grade One classroom at an Indonesian public elementary school, identifies supporting and inhibiting factors, and formulates practical improvements for sustained literacy development. A qualitative case study was conducted at SD Negeri 96 Palembang. Data were collected through classroom observation, semi-structured interviews with one Grade One teacher, the principal, the school literacy coordinator, and three parents, and documentation of lesson modules, reading corners, assessment notes, and school literacy records. The data were analyzed thematically through reduction, display, verification, and triangulation across methods and sources. The findings show that early literacy management operated through coordinated planning, Merdeka Curriculum-based lesson modules, 10-15 minute daily reading routines, read-aloud, shared reading, guided reading, local folklore texts, ability-based grouping, reading corners, daily formative assessment, portfolios, and semester reflection. The novelty of this study lies in positioning early literacy as an integrated classroom-management and school-management practice rather than a single reading activity. The study contributes a practical model for strengthening early literacy through differentiated instruction, locally contextual materials, common teaching guidelines, and structured parental involvement.

References

Barrett, J., & Kristen, T. (2021). One state’s trickle‑down, bottom‑up pathway to literacy intervention reform. Journal of Educational Change, 22(3), 355–378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-020-09392-1

Bingham, A. J. (2023). From Data Management to Actionable Findings: A Five-Phase Process of Qualitative Data Analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods. 22, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231183620

Brauckmann, S., Pashiardis, P., & Ärlestig, H. (2023). Bringing context and educational leadership together : fostering the professional development of school principals. Professional Development in Education, 49(1), 4–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2020.1747105

Chitsauko, G., Mmankoko, M., & Ramorola, Z. (2025). Unveiling educators’ readiness to teach through Digital Media (DM): The case of south Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 30(10), 13807–13834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13310-w

Connor, C. O., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Cutler, L., Schachter, R. E., Gabas, C., & Piasta, S. B. (2023). Patterns of Classroom Organization in Classrooms Where Children Exhibit Higher and Lower Language Gains. Early Education and Development, 34(5), 1128–1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2022.2106766

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-harvey; C., & Barron, B. (2020). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Ducker, N. (2022). Protecting and enhancing willingness to communicate with idiodynamic peer-peer strategy sharing. System, 103(April 2021), 102634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2021.102634

Garcia-Yeste, C., Gairal-Casado, R., & Novo, M. (2021). Scientific workshop program to improve science identity,science capital and educational aspirations of children at risk of social exclusion. Children and Youthservices 129(August). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2021.106189

Geron, T., & Brighouse, H. (2022). Conceptions of Educational Equity. 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584221121344

Häggström, M.,schmidt, C., & Margaretha, H. (2020). Enhancing children’s literacy and ecological literacy through critical place-based pedagogy. Environmental Education Research, 26(12), 1729–1745. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1812537

Hoadley, U. (2024). How dostructured pedagogy programmes affect reading instruction in African early grade classrooms? International Journal of Educational Development, 107(February), 103023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2024.103023

Ikhsan, M. N., & Hanum, F. (2025). Stake holders’ perspectives on whole-school approaches to prevent and address bullying and cyberbullying in Indonesian highschools. socialsciences & Humanities Open, 12(November), 102336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.102336

Khosa, M. (2025). The Effects of a Print-Rich Literacy Environment on Developing Early Reading skills in the Foundation Phase Classroom. Reading Psychology, 46(4), 331–359. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2024.2447243

Lehrl, s., Evangelou, M., &sammons, P. (2020). The home learning environment and its role inshaping children’s educational development. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 31(1), 1–6. 3453. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2020.1693487

Lim, W. M. (2025). What Is Qualitative Research? An Overview and Guidelines. https://doi.org/10.1177/14413582241264619

Masterson, M., Boynuegri, E., & Calder, A. (2024). Learning online and teaching face to face: Exploring the planned and enacted conception of teaching of preservice teachers onschool placement. 144(April). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104598

Mohr, R. P., & Price, C. (2020). A Comparison of Children Aged 4 – 5 Years Learning to Read Through Instructional Texts Containing Either a High or a Low Proportion of Phonically ‑ Decodable Words. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(1), 39–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-019-00970-4

Mulatu, E., & Regassa, T. (2022). Teaching reading skills in EFL classes : Practice and procedures teachers use to help learners with low reading skills. Cogent Education, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2022.2093493

Müller, B., Richter, T., & Karageorgos, P. (2020). Syllable-based reading improvement: Effects on word reading and reading comprehension in Grade 2. Learning and Instruction, 66(January), 101304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2020.101304

Nassaji, H. (2020). Good qualitative research. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168820941288

Nkomo,s. A., Magxala, X. P., & Lebopa, N. (2023). Early literacy experiences of two children during Covid-19 lockdown insouth Africa: Asemi-ethnographic study.d. https://doi.org/10.1177/14687984231154351

Premo, E., Ros, A., & Lin, Y. (2023). Pre-kindergarten teachers’ family engagement practices and English Language Learners’ attendance and early learning skills : Exploring the role of the linguistic context. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 63, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2022.10.005

Qi, Q., Tao, F., Hu, T., Anwer, N., Liu, A., Wei, Y., Wang, L., & Nee, Y. C. (2021). Enabling technologies and tools for digital twin. Journal of Manufacturing systems, 58(PB), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmsy.2019.10.001

Skage, I., Ertesvåg, S. K., Roland, P., & Dyrstad,s. M. (2020). Implementation of physically active lessons : A 2-year follow-up. Evaluation and Program Planning, 83(December 2019), 101874. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2020.101874

Sliwka, A., Klopsch, B., Beigel, J., & Tung, L. (2026). Transformational leadership for deeper learnin: shaping innovative school practices for enhanced learning. 62(1), 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-03-2023-0049

Svensson, I., Nordström, T., Lindeblad, E., Gustafson,s., Björn, M.,sand, C., Bäck, G. A., Nilsson,s., (2021). Effects of assistive technology forstudents with reading and writing disabilities. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 16(2), 196–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2019.1646821

Thordardottir, E. (2021). Adolescent language outcomes in a complex trilingual context : When typical does not mean unproblematic. Journal of Communication Disorders, 89(September 2020), 106060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcomdis.2020.106060

Walker, R.,swain, J., & Pellicano, E. (2022). “It’s about sharing a moment”: Parents’ views and experiences of home reading with their autistic children with moderate-to-severe intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 128(February), 104289. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104289

Xu, W. (2020). Applying Thematic Analysis to Education : A Hybrid Approach to Interpreting Data in Practitioner Research. 19, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920918810

Young, D. (2024). Identifying inclusive training needs with the inclusive practices in English language teaching observation scale. Asian-Pacific Journal ofsecond and Foreign Language Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40862-024-00287-9

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

Syafitri, E., Wardiah, D., & Eddy, S. (2026). Managing Early Literacy Learning in Grade One Elementary Classrooms. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 8(1), 138–151. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1629

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.