Principal Leadership Management in Improving Teacher’s Performance

Authors

  • Tini Yaparaduna Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Bukman Lian Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia
  • Pahlawan Pahlawan Universitas PGRI Palembang, South Sumatra, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1654

Keywords:

Management Leadership, Principal Leadership, Teacher’s Performance

Abstract

This study aims to describe and analyze the leadership management of school principals in improving teacher performance at SD Negeri 01 Tanjung Kukuh through four management stages: planning, implementation, evaluation, and follow-up. A descriptive qualitative approach was employed. Data were collected through in-depth interviews with principals and teachers, participatory observation of leadership behavior and teaching performance, and documentation studies of learning tools and supervision reports. Analysis followed Miles and Huberman's interactive model, encompassing data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing. Findings reveal that: (1) planning is conducted collaboratively, involving teachers in vision formulation and supervision scheduling; (2) implementation occurs through technical guidance, motivational awards, and exemplary principal discipline; (3) evaluation is carried out via periodic clinical supervision to monitor alignment between lesson plans and classroom practice; and (4) follow-up is realized by facilitating teachers' sustainable professional development through workshops and teacher working groups (KKG) to address identified obstacles. This study provides a holistic, stage-by-stage model of integrated leadership management in a rural elementary context, an approach rarely documented in Indonesian school leadership literature. Findings offer a replicable framework for principals seeking to systematically enhance teacher professionalism through structured, participatory, and reflective management practices. This research contributes empirical evidence that integrated leadership management across all four stages effectively improves teacher performance, demonstrating that collaborative planning, supportive implementation, clinical evaluation, and targeted follow-up are mutually reinforcing strategies for sustainable educational quality improvement.

References

Abbaspour, F., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2024). Uncovering the Role of Principals in Enhancing Teacher Professional Learning in a Centralized Education System. International Journal of Educational Management, 38(3), 873–889. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEM-12-2023-0654

Alzoraiki, M., Ahmad, A. R., Ateeq, A. A., Naji, G. M. A., Almaamari, Q., & Beshr, B. A. H. (2023). Impact of Teachers’ Commitment to the Relationship between Transformational Leadership and Sustainable Teaching Performance. Sustainability, 15(5), 4620. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15054620

Amelia, C., Aprilianto, A., Supriatna, D., Rusydi, I., & Zahari, N. E. (2022). The Principal’s Role as Education Supervisor in Improving Teacher Professionalism. Nidhomul Haq : Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 7(1), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.31538/ndh.v7i1.2075

Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Improving Organizational Effectiveness through Transformational Leadership. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Cansoy, R., Gümüş, S., & Walker, A. (2025). Challenges in Implementing Instructional Leadership: Insights from Turkish School Principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 53(5), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241263915

Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Advanced Educational Services.

Engida, M. A., Iyasu, A. S., & Fentie, Y. M. (2024). Impact of Teaching Quality on Student Achievement: Student Evidence. Frontiers in Education, 9. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1367317

Hallinger, P. (2020). Science Mapping the Knowledge Base on Educational Leadership and Management from the Emerging Regions of Asia, Africa and Latin America, 1965–2018. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(2), 209–230. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143218822772

Hallinger, P. (2022). Developing Instructional Leadership Teams in High Schools 1. In School Effectiveness and School Improvement. Routledge.

Ikenga, G. U., & van der Sijde, P. (2024). Twenty-First Century Competencies; about Competencies for Industry 5.0 and the Opportunities for Emerging Economies. Sustainability, 16(16), 7166. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16167166

Kareem, J., Patrick, H. A., Prabakaran, N., B, V., Tantia, V., M. P. M., P. K., & Mukherjee, U. (2023). Transformational Educational Leaders Inspire School Educators’ Commitment. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1171513

Leithwood, K. (2021). A Review of Evidence about Equitable School Leadership. Education Sciences, 11(8), 377. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11080377

Maqbool, S., Zafeer, H. M. I., Maqbool, S., Zeng, P., Draissi, Z., & Javed, S. (2024). Stance of Numerous Leadership Styles and Their Effect on Teaching to Sustain Academic Performance at the High School Level. Heliyon, 10(16), e36438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36438

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2020). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. Sage.

Müller, U., Lude, A., & Hancock, D. R. (2020). Leading Schools towards Sustainability. Fields of Action and Management Strategies for Principals. Sustainability, 12(7), 3031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12073031

Mulyasa. (2022). Principal Management and Leadership. Jakarta: Penerbit PT. Bumi Aksara.

Nurabadi, A., Irianto, J., Bafadal, I., Juharyanto, J., Gunawan, I., & Adha, M. A. (2021). The Effect of Instructional, Transformational and Spiritual Leadership on Elementary School Teachers’ Performance and Students’ Achievements. Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan, 40(1), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.21831/cp.v40i1.35641

Oluwatosin, A. (2022). The Role of Support and Follow-up in Improving the Effectiveness of Continuous Training Implementation for Teachers. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 1(2), 50–55.

Pardosi, J., & Utari, T. I. (2022). Effective Principal Leadership Behaviors to Improve the Teacher Performance and the Student Achievement. F1000Research, 10, 465. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.51549.2

Robbins, S. P., & Coulter, M. (2012). Management (eleventh e). Prentice Hall.

Sariakin, S., Yeni, M., Usman, M. Bin, Mare, A. S., Munzir, M., & Saleh, M. (2025). Fostering a Productive Educational Environment: The Roles of Leadership, Management Practices, and Teacher Motivation. Frontiers in Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1499064

Saro, J., Pelesco, E., Abiao, J., Longaquit, J., Apique, J., & Palanog, J. G. (2025). Extent of Teachers’ Manifestation Toward Instructional Supervision and Assistance from School Leaders: Its Relationship to Students’ Academic Success. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Viewpoints, 1(5), 604–630. https://doi.org/10.64612/ijiv.v1i5.38

Suyanto. (2023). Educational Leadership in the Digital Age. Jakarta: Kencana.

Uka, A., & Prendi, A. (2021). Motivation as an Indicator of Performance and Productivity from the Perspective of Employees. Management & Marketing. Challenges for the Knowledge Society, 16(3), 268–285. https://doi.org/10.2478/mmcks-2021-0016

Wahjosumidjo. (2020). Principal Leadership, Theoretical Review and Problems. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Wahyu, S., Rizal, F., & Syah, N. (2021). Teacher Performance Analysis in the Learning Process. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 5(1), 67. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i1.30758

Downloads

Published

2026-07-13

How to Cite

Yaparaduna, T., Lian, B., & Pahlawan, P. (2026). Principal Leadership Management in Improving Teacher’s Performance. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 8(1), 314–327. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1654

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.