Pedagogical Transformation in the Technological Era: A Qualitative Study of Digital Education Practices in Indonesian Senior High Schools

Authors

  • Agus Minarto Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Muhajir Muhajir Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia
  • Ahmad Hatip Universitas Dr. Soetomo, Surabaya, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v6i1.1108

Keywords:

Digital Education, Digital Literacy, Educational Technology, Pedagogical Transformation, Qualitative Approach

Abstract

This study explores the pedagogical transformation driven by digital education technologies in Indonesian State Senior High Schools, particularly in Pamekasan Regency. Employing a qualitative approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis from 15 teachers and 20 students. Thematic analysis was used to identify core patterns and themes. Results reveal significant shifts in the teaching and learning paradigm, where digital tools such as Google Classroom and Zoom enable more flexible, accessible, and student-centered learning. However, challenges such as limited infrastructure, digital skill gaps, and reduced face-to-face interaction persist. The role of educators is evolving from knowledge transmitters to facilitators. Successful implementation of digital education requires robust infrastructure, sustained teacher training, and inclusive policies. Policymakers should prioritize equitable access to digital tools and upskilling programs for educators. Future research should expand geographically and adopt mixed methods to improve generalizability.

References

Abedi, E. A. (2024). Tensions between technology integration practices of teachers and ICT in education policy expectations: implications for change in teacher knowledge, beliefs and teaching practices. Journal of Computers in Education, 11(4), 1215–1234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40692-023-00296-6

Adeniran, A., Adedeji, A., Nwosu, E., Nwugo, E., & Nnamani, G. (2023). Ed-Tech Landscape and Challenges in Sub-Saharan Africa. https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/bitstreams/5ae5f9a9-9296-409f-9c0f-60f4ff6d4f74/download

Anderson, T. (2008). The theory and practice of online learning. athabasca university press.

Babchuk, W. A. (2017). Book review: Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation , by SB Merriam and EJ Tisdell. SAGE Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713616671930

Barut Tugtekin, E., & Dursun, O. O. (2022). Effect of animated and interactive video variations on learners’ motivation in distance Education. Education and Information Technologies, 27(3), 3247–3276. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10735-5

Bielik, T., Finnie, K., Peek-Brown, D., Klager, C., Touitou, I., Schneider, B., & Krajcik, J. (2022). High school teachers’ perspectives on shifting towards teaching NGSS-aligned project based learning curricular units. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 33(4), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1961973

Boonmoh, A., Jumpakate, T., & Karpklon, S. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions and experience in using technology for the classroom. Computer-Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(1), 1–24. https://callej.org/index.php/journal/article/view/320

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2024). Thematic analysis. In Encyclopedia of quality of life and well-being research (pp. 7187–7193). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-17299-1_3470

Cockerham, D., Lin, L., Ndolo, S., & Schwartz, M. (2021). Voices of the students: Adolescent well-being and social interactions during the emergent shift to online learning environments. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7523–7541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10601-4

Coronella, T., & Aiken-Wisniewski, S. A. (2023). Using Qualitative Methods. In Scholarly inquiry in academic Advising. Routledge.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design Choosing among Five Approaches (4th Editio). SAGE Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks.

Cwala, S. C. (2022). Digital transformation in the basic education sector: a case study of selected disadvantaged schools in the Western Cape. Cape Peninsula University of Technology.

Enworo, O. C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln’s parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372–384. https://doi.org/10.1108/qrj-08-2022-0116

Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: the teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4

Gabriel, F., Marrone, R., Van Sebille, Y., Kovanovic, V., & de Laat, M. (2022). Digital education strategies around the world: practices and policies. Irish Educational Studies, 41(1), 85–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2021.2022513

Garrison, D. R., & Vaughan, N. D. (2008). Blended Learning in Higher Education: Framework, Principles, and Guidelines. Jossey-Bass.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.susoc.2022.05.004

Heredia, J., Castillo-Vergara, M., Geldes, C., Gamarra, F. M. C., Flores, A., & Heredia, W. (2022). How do digital capabilities affect firm performance? The mediating role of technological capabilities in the “new normal.” Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100171

Khlaif, Z. N., Sanmugam, M., Joma, A. I., Odeh, A., & Barham, K. (2023). Factors influencing teacher’s technostress experienced in using emerging technology: A qualitative study. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 28(2), 865–899. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-022-09607-9

Martin, D. R. (2021). M-learning and the EFL classroom: Using mobiles as tools to engage teenagers in speaking activities. BELT-Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal, 12(1), e39752–e39752. https://doi.org/10.15448/2178-3640.2021.1.39752

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.

Mukhlis, H., Haenilah, E. Y., Maulina, D., & Nursafitri, L. (2024). Connectivism and digital age education: Insights, challenges, and future directions. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 45(3). https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kjss/article/download/274837/185125

Muyambi, G. C., & Ramorola, M. Z. (2025). Unveiling educators’ readiness to teach through Digital Media (DM): The case of South Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13310-w

Onitsuka, K., Hidayat, A. R. R. T., & Huang, W. (2018). Challenges for the next level of digital divide in rural Indonesian communities. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 84(2), e12021. https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12021

Puspitasari, L., & Ishii, K. (2016). Digital divides and mobile Internet in Indonesia: Impact of smartphones. Telematics and Informatics, 33(2), 472–483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2015.11.001

Qureshi, M. I., Khan, N., Raza, H., Imran, A., & Ismail, F. (2021). Digital technologies in education 4.0. Does it enhance the effectiveness of learning? http://hdl.handle.net/123456789/25661

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2021). Balancing technology, pedagogy and the new normal: Post-pandemic challenges for higher education. Postdigital Science and Education, 3(3), 715–742. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1

Redecker, C., & Punie, Y. (2017). Digitale kompetenz lehrender. In European Union. Zugriff am (Vol. 21).

Sayaf, A. M., Alamri, M. M., Alqahtani, M. A., & Alrahmi, W. M. (2022). Factors influencing university students’ adoption of digital learning technology in teaching and learning. Sustainability, 14(1), 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010493

Stoian, C. E., Fărcașiu, M. A., Dragomir, G.-M., & Gherheș, V. (2022). Transition from online to face-to-face education after COVID-19: The benefits of online education from students’ perspective. Sustainability, 14(19), 12812. https://doi.org/ 10.3390/su141912812

Timotheou, S., Miliou, O., Dimitriadis, Y., Sobrino, S. V., Giannoutsou, N., Cachia, R., Monés, A. M., & Ioannou, A. (2023). Impacts of digital technologies on education and factors influencing schools’ digital capacity and transformation: A literature review. Education and Information Technologies, 28(6), 6695–6726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-11431-8

Tisdell, E. J., Merriam, S. B., & Stuckey-Peyrot, H. L. (2025). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. John Wiley & Sons.

UNESCO. (2020). Ensuring effective distance learning during COVID-19 disruption: guidance for teachers. https:n9.cl/z4am7

Wang, C., Chen, X., Yu, T., Liu, Y., & Jing, Y. (2024). Education reform and change driven by digital technology: a bibliometric study from a global perspective. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-02717-y

Zarei, S., & Mohammadi, S. (2022). Challenges of higher education related to e-learning in developing countries during COVID-19 spread: a review of the perspectives of students, instructors, policymakers, and ICT experts. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(57), 85562–85568. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-14647-2

Zou, D., Xie, H., & Kohnke, L. (2025). Navigating the Future: Establishing a Framework for Educators’ Pedagogic Artificial Intelligence Competence. European Journal of Education, 60(2), e70117. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.70117

Downloads

Published

2025-05-30

How to Cite

Minarto, A., Muhajir, M., & Hatip, A. (2025). Pedagogical Transformation in the Technological Era: A Qualitative Study of Digital Education Practices in Indonesian Senior High Schools. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 6(1), 358–367. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v6i1.1108

Similar Articles

<< < 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.