Normative Ambiguity of Cohabitation in Indonesia’s National Criminal Code

Authors

  • Shihaf Ismi Salman Najib Universitas Airlangga, East Java, Indonesia
  • Sakti Boy Sihombing Universitas Airlangga, East Java, Indonesia
  • Balqis Amalia Universitas Airlangga, East Java, Indonesia
  • Fatikha Aisya Rahmi Universitas Airlangga, East Java, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1691

Keywords:

Article 412, Cohabitation in Criminal Code, Legal Certainty, Normative Ambiguity, Right to Privacy

Abstract

This study examines the normative ambiguity of the cohabitation offense in Article 412 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code, particularly the absence of measurable temporal criteria and objective indicators for the phrase “living together as husband and wife outside marriage.” It employs legal research using statutory and conceptual approaches. Primary legal materials include the 1945 Constitution and the national Criminal Code, while secondary materials consist of criminal-law scholarship on legality, legal certainty, privacy, overcriminalization, and evidentiary standards. The materials were inventoried, classified, interpreted, and analyzed deductively. The study finds that Article 412 distinguishes cohabitation from adultery by focusing on an enduring domestic pattern rather than a single sexual act, yet it does not define the duration, frequency, continuity, or corroborating evidence required to establish that pattern. This omission grants broad interpretive discretion to investigators, prosecutors, and judges and may produce inconsistent, arbitrary, or discriminatory enforcement. The article proposes a cumulative operational framework based on sustained co-residence, repeated overnight presence, shared domestic routines, reciprocal representation as a household, and verifiable documentary or testimonial evidence. The framework offers a practical basis for implementing guidelines while preserving the complaint-based character of the offense, the principle of lex certa, due process, and constitutional privacy.

References

Allan, T. R. S. (2026). Law, reason, and justice: a defence of the declaratory theory of judicial decision. Jurisprudence, 17(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2025.2473166

Banaji, M. R., Fiske, S. T., & Massey, D. S. (2021). Systemic racism: individuals and interactions, institutions and society. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00349-3

Banet-Weiser, S. (2021). ‘Ruined’ lives: Mediated white male victimhood. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 24(1), 60–80. https://doi.org/10.1177/1367549420985840

Bero, S., & Sarch, A. (2020). The Problem of Over-Inclusive Offenses: A Closer Look at Duff on Legal Moralism and Mala Prohibita. Criminal Law and Philosophy, 14(3), 395–416. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11572-020-09538-5

Bohr, J., & Lengerer, A. (2024). Partnership Dynamics of LGB People and Heterosexuals: Patterns of First Partnership Formation and First Cohabitation. In European Journal of Population (Vol. 40, Number 1). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10680-024-09697-4

Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772

Cairns, I. (2020). The Moorov doctrine and coercive control: Proving a ‘course of behaviour’ under s. 1 of the Domestic Abuse (Scotland) Act 2018. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 24(4), 396–417. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712720959857

Calliari, E., Serdeczny, O., & Vanhala, L. (2020). Making sense of the politics in the climate change loss & damage debate. Global Environmental Change, 64(July), 102133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102133

Campedelli, G. M., Aziani, A., & Favarin, S. (2021). Exploring the Immediate Effects of COVID-19 Containment Policies on Crime: an Empirical Analysis of the Short-Term Aftermath in Los Angeles. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(5), 704–727. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09578-6

Charman, S., Newiss, G., Smith, P., Inkpen, R., Ilett, C., Ghaemmaghami, A., & Bennett, S. (2023). ‘Giving the right service to different people’: revisiting police legitimacy in the Covid-19 era. Policing and Society, 33(3), 348–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2022.2113785

Colomb, C., & Moreira de Souza, T. (2024). Illegal short-term rentals, regulatory enforcement and informal practices in the age of digital platforms. European Urban and Regional Studies, 31(4), 328–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/09697764231155386

Dhawan, N. B., & Bhasin, H. (2024). Combating domestic violence in West Bengal, India: Gendered norms and legal regulations. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 7(March), 100352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedro.2024.100352

Dowuona-Hammond, C., Atuguba, R. A., & Tuokuu, F. X. D. (2020). Women’s Survival in Ghana: What Has Law Got to Do With It? SAGE Open, 10(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244020941472

Drápal, J., & Plesničar, M. (2025). Sentencing Elsewhere: Structuring Sentencing Discretion in Post-communist Europe. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research, 31(2), 251–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-023-09568-4

Duncan, S., van Hooff, J., & Carter, J. (2025). Living Together Apart: Size and Significance of Co-Residency Following Relationship Breakdown in Contemporary Britain. Sociological Research Online, 30(1), 78–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/13607804241246411

Elrick, L. E. (2020). The ecosystem concept: a holistic approach to privacy protection. International Review of Law, Computers and Technology, 0869, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600869.2020.1784564

Fröwis, M., Gottschalk, T., Haslhofer, B., Rückert, C., & Pesch, P. (2020). Safeguarding the evidential value of forensic cryptocurrency investigations. Forensic Science International: Digital Investigation, 33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsidi.2019.200902

Gleißner, W., Günther, T., & Walkshäusl, C. (2022). Financial sustainability: measurement and empirical evidence. In Journal of Business Economics (Vol. 92, Number 3). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11573-022-01081-0

Grady, R. H., Ditto, P. H., & Loftus, E. F. (2021). Nevertheless, partisanship persisted: fake news warnings help briefly, but bias returns with time. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-021-00315-z

Greany, T. (2020). Place-based governance and leadership in decentralised school systems: evidence from England. Journal of Education Policy, 37(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2020.1792554

Jansen, B. J., Jung, S., & Salminen, J. (2023). Employing large language models in survey research. Natural Language Processing Journal, 4(May), 100020. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nlp.2023.100020

Keiff, S. (2024). Latour’s Discernment Tools in Action: Exploring and Solving Complex Social Problems Through Participatory Methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods , 23, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241286844

Kira, B. (2024). When non-consensual intimate deepfakes go viral: The insufficiency of the UK Online Safety Act. Computer Law and Security Review, 54(July), 106024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2024.106024

Kosec, K., & Wantchekon, L. (2020). Can information improve rural governance and service delivery? World Development, 125, 104376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.07.017

Krzyżanowski, M. (2020). Normalization and the discursive construction of “new” norms and “new” normality: discourse in the paradoxes of populism and neoliberalism. Social Semiotics, 30(4), 431–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1766193

Laaser, K., & Karlsson, J. C. (2022). Towards a Sociology of Meaningful Work. Work, Employment and Society, 36(5), 798–815. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211055998

Magaloni, B., Melo, V., & Robles, G. (2022). Warriors and Vigilantes as Police Officers: Evidence from a Field Experiment with Body-Cameras in Rio de Janeiro. In SSRN Electronic Journal. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4005710

Mamak, K. (2024). Should criminal law protect love relation with robots? AI and Society, 39(2), 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-022-01439-6

McDonnell, M. H., & Nurmohamed, S. (2021). When are organizations punished for organizational misconduct? A review and research agenda. Research in Organizational Behavior, 41, 100150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2021.100150

Mergaliyev, A., Asutay, M., Avdukic, A., & Karbhari, Y. (2021). Higher Ethical Objective (Maqasid al-Shari’ah) Augmented Framework for Islamic Banks: Assessing Ethical Performance and Exploring Its Determinants. In Journal of Business Ethics (Vol. 170, Number 4). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04331-4

Meterko, V., & Cooper, G. (2022). Cognitive Biases in Criminal Case Evaluation: A Review of the Research. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology, 37(1), 101–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-020-09425-8

Mökander, J., Axente, M., Casolari, F., & Floridi, L. (2022). Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation. Minds and Machines, 32(2), 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09577-4

Moret, J., Andrikopoulos, A., & Dahinden, J. (2021). Contesting categories: cross-border marriages from the perspectives of the state, spouses and researchers. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 47(2), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2019.1625124

O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Intercoder Reliability in Qualitative Research: Debates and Practical Guidelines. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220

Ouellet, F., Hetroy, E., Patard, G., Gauthier-Davies, C., & Leclerc, C. (2022). Co-Occurrence of Violence on the Severity of Abuse in Intimate Relationships. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24), NP21927–NP21952. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211064238

Piel, J., & Robra, B. P. (2023). “We never lived together either”: Couples’ housing (re-) arrangements in later life. Journal of Aging Studies, 67(December 2022), 101190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2023.101190

Piquero, A. R., Riddell, J. R., Bishopp, S. A., Narvey, C., Reid, J. A., & Piquero, N. L. (2020). Staying Home, Staying Safe? A Short-Term Analysis of COVID-19 on Dallas Domestic Violence. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45(4), 601–635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-020-09531-7

Polonsky, M. J., Rotman, J., Weber, V., & Kumar, P. (2025). How meaningless and substantive green claims jointly determine product environmental perceptions. International Journal of Advertising, 44(3), 396–427. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2024.2377503

Radcliffe, L., Cassell, C., & Spencer, L. (2023). Work-family habits? Exploring the persistence of traditional work-family decision making in dual-earner couples. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 145(September 2022), 103914. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103914

Reeves, E., McGowan, J., & Scott, B. (2025). ‘It was Dangerous, Corrosive and Cruel but not Illegal’: Legal help-seeking Behaviours Amongst LGBTQA+ Domestic and Family Violence Victim-survivors Experiencing Coercive Control in Australia. Journal of Family Violence, 40(1), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-023-00569-9

Rigotti, C., & McGlynn, C. (2022). Towards an EU criminal law on violence against women: The ambitions and limitations of the Commission’s proposal to criminalise image-based sexual abuse. New Journal of European Criminal Law, 13(4), 452–477. https://doi.org/10.1177/20322844221140713

Rosander, L., & Kadefors, A. (2023). Implementing relational contracting in a public client organization: the influence of policy clashes, resources and project autonomy. Construction Management and Economics, 41(8), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/01446193.2023.2190992

Satcher, M. F., Belenko, S., Coetzer-Liversage, A., Wilson, K. J., McCart, M. R., Drazdowski, T. K., Fallin-Bennett, A., Zaller, N., Schultheis, A. M., Hogue, A., Vest, N., Sheidow, A. J., del Pozo, B., Watson, D. P., Hibbard, P. F., Stevens, R., & Stein, L. A. R. (2024). Linkage facilitation for opioid use disorder in criminal legal system contexts: a primer for researchers, clinicians, and legal practitioners. Health and Justice, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40352-024-00291-8

Schickhardt, C., Fleischer, H., & Winkler, E. C. (2020). Do patients and research subjects have a right to receive their genomic raw data? An ethical and legal analysis. BMC Medical Ethics, 21(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-020-0446-y

Selim, H., Korkman, J., Pirjatanniemi, E., & Antfolk, J. (2023). Asylum claims based on sexual orientation: a review of psycho-legal issues in credibility assessments. Psychology, Crime and Law, 29(10), 1001–1030. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2022.2044038

Singh, D., & Bhandari, D. S. (2021). Legacy of Honor and Violence: An Analysis of Factors Responsible for Honor Killings in Afghanistan, Canada, India, and Pakistan as Discussed in Selected Documentaries on Real Cases. SAGE Open, 11(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211022323

Syrda, J. (2023). Gendered Housework: Spousal Relative Income, Parenthood and Traditional Gender Identity Norms. Work, Employment and Society, 37(3), 794–813. https://doi.org/10.1177/09500170211069780

Tuthill, E. L., Maltby, A. E., DiClemente, K., & Pellowski, J. A. (2020). Longitudinal Qualitative Methods in Health Behavior and Nursing Research: Assumptions, Design, Analysis and Lessons Learned. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 19, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920965799

Walton, K. M., & Tiede, G. (2020). Brief report: Does “healthy” family functioning look different for families who have a child with autism? Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 72(February), 101527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rasd.2020.101527

Whitten, S. (2023). A Republican Conception of Counterspeech. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 26(4), 555–575. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-023-10409-w

Wilson-Kovacs, D., Helm, R., Growns, B., & Redfern, L. (2023). Digital evidence in defence practice: Prevalence, challenges and expertise. International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 27(3), 235–253. https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127231171620

Yu, F. (2022). Putting the ‘presumption’ back in the ‘presumption of innocence.’ International Journal of Evidence and Proof, 26(4), 342–358. https://doi.org/10.1177/13657127221124361

Downloads

Published

2026-07-27

How to Cite

Najib, S. I. S., Sihombing, S. B., Amalia, B., & Rahmi, F. A. (2026). Normative Ambiguity of Cohabitation in Indonesia’s National Criminal Code. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 8(1), 532–549. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v8i1.1691

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.