Evaluation of the Relevance and Effectiveness of the C Level Equivalency Education for Productive Age Learners

Authors

  • Liza Tri Easti Putri Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Sudarwan Danim Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Muhammad Kristiawan Universitas Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1316

Keywords:

C Level Equivalency Program, Goal-Oriented Evaluation, Non-Formal Education, PKBM Putri Raflesia, Productive-Age Learners

Abstract

In Indonesia, a significant portion of the productive-age population lacks formal secondary education credentials, limiting their employment and further education opportunities. This study employed a qualitative goal-oriented evaluation (Tyler, 1949) to assess the relevance and effectiveness of the C Level Equivalency Program at PKBM Putri Raflesia, using interviews, observations, and document analysis. Findings indicate that the program’s objectives are highly relevant to learners’ needs for diplomas and skills. The flexible, andragogical approach was effective in improving comprehension and participation, leading to significant impacts on graduates’ self-confidence, employment, and educational mobility. The study concludes that the C Level program is a vital mechanism for socio-economic empowerment, demonstrating that program success hinges more on pedagogical strategies and relevance than on material resources. This research contributes by highlighting the role of community-based non-formal education in addressing educational inequality, providing practical insights for policymakers to strengthen adult learning programs, and offering novelty in applying Tyler’s model to evaluate non-formal education for productive-age learners in Indonesia.

References

Akerfeldt, A., Bergdahl, N., & Hrastinski, S. (2024). Adult learners ‘ perceptions of distance education. https://doi.org/10.1177/14779714231200422

Alfauzan, A. A. H., & Tarchouna, N. (2017). The Role of an Aligned Curriculum Design in the Achievement of Learning Outcomes. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 4(3 SE-Articles), 81–91. https://doi.org/10.20448/journal.509.2017.43.81.91

Arbarini, M., Pathumcaroenwattana, W., Tri, F., & Bagus, S. (2025). Transforming Communities through Non-Formal Education : A Study of Indonesia and Thailand (Vol. 2024, Nomor Ijcah 2024). Atlantis Press SARL. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-317-7

Ayu, N., Novitasari, D., & Shofwan, I. (2024). The Effect of Educators ‘ Pedagogical Competence on the Critical Thinking Ability of Equivalency Education Learners. 18(1), 36–44.

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document Analysis as a Qualitative Research Method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Colorafi, Karen Jiggins, & Evans, Bronwynne. (2016). Qualitative Descriptive Methods in Health Science Research. HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal, 9(4), 16–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1937586715614171

Hall, Steven, & Liebenberg, Linda. (2024). Qualitative Description as an Introductory Method to Qualitative Research for Master’s-Level Students and Research Trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 16094069241242264. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Harahap, S. S., & Asmawi, M. (2008). Tyler ‘ s Goal -Oriented Approach For The Evaluation Of Leadership Training Implementation. 1326–1334.

Heuer, A., Serratos-sotelo, L., & Motel-klingebiel, A. (2025). How perception affects participation : the case of adult learning and continued vocational education and training in Europe. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 44(1), 17–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370.2024.2398516

Ines, G. E. L. (2016). Classification of learning activities ( CLA ).

Junanto, S., Tuanaya, R., Shofa, M. F., Muntaha, M., & Permatasari, L. (2024). Learning evaluation of the study group of Packages C programme in Sragen Regency. 28(1), 1–14.

Kallio, H., Pietilä, A.-M., Johnson, M., & Kangasniemi, M. (2016). Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi-structured interview guide. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(12), 2954–2965. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13031

Kosyakova, Y., & Bills, D. B. (2021). Formal adult education and socioeconomic inequality : Second chances or Matthew Effects ? July, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12920

Melania, M., Kadir, A., Respati, A., & Sachin, P. (2024). Contribution of Non-Formal Education to Improve the Quality of Human Resources. 10(1), 169–178.

Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02514.x

Neergaard, M. A., Olesen, F., Andersen, R. S., & Sondergaard, J. (2009). Qualitative description – the poor cousin of health research? BMC Medical Research Methodology, 9(1), 52. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-9-52

Nowell, Lorelli S, Norris, Jill M, White, Deborah E, & Moules, Nancy J. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1609406917733847. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic Analysis : Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. 16, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful Sampling for Qualitative Data Collection and Analysis in Mixed Method Implementation Research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y

Right, G. S. (2023). Trends in Adult Learning.

Sunarti, V., Iswari, M., Hidayati, A., & Gusmanti, R. (2022). Analysis of Andragogy Approach in Aspects of Tutor Performance. 6(2), 200–206. https://doi.org/10.23887/bisma.v6i2.51160

Taryamah, E. (2022). Study Of Equivalence Education Program Students ‘ Soft Skills Level In Preparing To Enter The Competitive Digital Age Job Market. 5(2), 46–58.

Trisnamansyah, S. (2010). Facilitative Learning Model To Improve Learning Creativity In The Equivalent Education Program Package C. 5(2), 111–119.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-02

How to Cite

Putri, L. T. E., Danim, S., & Kristiawan, M. (2026). Evaluation of the Relevance and Effectiveness of the C Level Equivalency Education for Productive Age Learners. Journal of Social Work and Science Education, 7(1), 141–155. https://doi.org/10.52690/jswse.v7i1.1316

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.