Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Pemanfaatan Artificial Intellegence (AI) ChatGPT Sebagai Sumber Informasi

Authors

  • Tiara Puspita Sari Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Yoka Yoka Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Yunika Fitri Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Intan Utami Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia
  • Bambang Irawan Universitas Islam Negeri Fatmawati Sukarno Bengkulu, Bengkulu, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i2.1451

Keywords:

ChatGPT, Source of Information, Students’ Perception

Abstract

This study was conducted on students of the Islamic Religious Education Study Program at Fatmawati Sukarno State Islamic University of Bengkulu from the 2022, 2023, and 2024 cohorts. The purpose of this study is to determine the perceptions of students and teaching staff regarding the use of AI ChatGPT as a source of information. This research is qualitative in nature with a descriptive approach. The data collection techniques include interviews, participant observation, and documentation. Meanwhile, data analysis techniques are carried out through data reduction, data display, data verification, and drawing conclusions in accordance with this research. The results of this study consist of two main findings. First, students’ perceptions of the use of AI ChatGPT as a source of information show various opinions and experiences. Students assess that ChatGPT provides a considerable positive impact, especially in facilitating access to information, answering questions, understanding learning materials, and helping to complete academic tasks. However, there are also negative aspects, namely causing dependency, reducing motivation to read books, and weakening critical thinking skills. Second, the perceptions of teaching staff indicate that lecturers consider ChatGPT as a technological innovation that provides many benefits for both lecturers and students, especially in accelerating information searches, helping to simplify concepts, and supporting the preparation of teaching materials. AI ChatGPT is considered to have a positive impact of around 80–85% as long as it is used wisely. However, ChatGPT can have negative effects if students do not develop and validate the information provided by ChatGPT, which can lead to dependency, reduced critical thinking, and decreased originality.

References

Awaliyah, N. S., & Mukarromah, A. (2025). Persepsi Mahasiswa terhadap Aplikasi Chat GPT sebagai Media Komunikasi Digial (Studi Kasus Komunikasi Massa pada Mahasiswa IIQ Jakarta). Kordinat: Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam, 24(2), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v24i2.46743

Fadli, M. R. (2021). Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif. Humanika, kajian ilmiah mata kuliah umum, 21(1), 33-54. https://files01.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/440358389.pdf

Farrokhnia, M., Banihashem, S. K., Noroozi, O., & Wals, A. (2024). A SWOT analysis of ChatGPT: Implications for educational practice and research. Innovations in education and teaching international, 61(3), 460-474. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2023.2195846

Habibi, F. N. A., Safitri, S. S. A., & Basuki, B. (2025). Penggunaan Artificial Intelligence dalam Proses Audit: Sudut Pandang Etika Islam. Equity, 28(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.34209/equ.v28i1.7256

Haki, U., & Prahastiwi, E. D. (2024). Strategi pengumpulan dan analisis data dalam penelitian kualitatif pendidikan. Jurnal Inovasi Dan Teknologi Pendidikan, 3(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.46306/jurinotep.v3i1.67

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., & Singh, R. P. (2022). An era of ChatGPT as a significant futuristic support tool: A study on features, abilities, and challenges. BenchCouncil transactions on benchmarks, standards and evaluations, 2(4), 100089. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbench.2023.100089

Haviki, N., Siswanto, S., Novalia, N., Jumaini, N., & Purnamasari, N. (2024). Persepsi Mahasiswaterhadappenggunaan Chatgptdalam Menunjang Pembelajaran Di IAIN Curup. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.47783/jurpendigu.v5i2.729

Luo, J., Zheng, C., Yin, J., & Teo, H. H. (2025). Design and assessment of AI-based learning tools in higher education: A systematic review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1), 42. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-025-00540-2

Rahmah, S., & Ramli, M. (2025). Pemanfaatan ChatGPT Dalam Mendukung Kinerja Akademik Mahasiswa. Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi, 2(6), 479-493. https://doi.org/10.71282/jurmie.v2i6.506

Ratnawati, D. (2025). Persepsi Mahasiswa Universitas Islam Negeri Jurai Siwo Lampung Terhadap Penggunaan Aplikasi Chatgpt dalam Proses Pembelajaran (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung). https://repository.metrouniv.ac.id/id/eprint/12113/

Sebastian, G. (2023). Do ChatGPT and other AI chatbots pose a cybersecurity risk?: An exploratory study. International Journal of Security and Privacy in Pervasive Computing (IJSPPC), 15(1), 1-11.

Sufendi, S., & Kamal, R. (2023). Pentingnya etika pemanfaatan Chat GPT pada penyusunan karya tulis mahasiswa. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(6), 2728-2734.

Wang, X., Huang, R. T., Sommer, M., Pei, B., Shidfar, P., Rehman, M. S., ... & Martin, F. (2024). The efficacy of artificial intelligence-enabled adaptive learning systems from 2010 to 2022 on learner outcomes: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 62(6), 1348-1383. https://doi.org/10.1177/07356331241240459

Wibowo, T. U. S. H., Akbar, F., & Fauzan, M. S. (2023). Tantangan dan peluang penggunaan aplikasi chat GPT dalam pelaksanaan pembelajaran sejarah berbasis dimensi 5.0. Jurnal Petisi (Pendidikan Teknologi Informasi), 4(2), 69-76. https://e-journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpetisi/article/view/782

Downloads

Published

2026-01-30

How to Cite

Sari, T. P., Yoka, Y., Fitri, Y., Utami, I., & Irawan, B. (2026). Persepsi Mahasiswa Dalam Pemanfaatan Artificial Intellegence (AI) ChatGPT Sebagai Sumber Informasi. Journal of Innovation in Teaching and Instructional Media, 6(2), 536–545. https://doi.org/10.52690/jitim.v6i2.1451

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.